© 2003-2013 Ironclad Games Corporation Vancouver, BC. All rights reserved.
© 2006-2013 Stardock Entertainment
Sign Up
|
Lost Login?
Home
Sins of a Solar Empire
Strategy
Tweet
Any reason to take Cobalts over Garda?
By
Knighty4
on February 12, 2008 1:48:29 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
Knighty4
Join Date 02/2008
0
Profile
Posts By
Is there any reason to use Cobalt's over Garda's? Are auto-cannons just really bad versus ships as opposed to lasers?
6 Replies
Search this post
Advanced Search
Subscription Options
Subscribe to this post
Do not email me updates for this post
Email me updates for this post
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #1
Windexglow
Join Date 07/2007
+3
February 12, 2008 1:55:20 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
Garda Flak Frigates = Good against fighters/bombers, but not much else. Please read the descriptions
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Reply #2
Humility
Join Date 09/2007
+7
February 12, 2008 2:06:39 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
build one or two Garda Flak Frigates in your fleet but I dont build them at all, unless it's needed badly.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Reply #3
Knighty4
Join Date 02/2008
0
February 12, 2008 2:09:04 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
Yes, but what kind of reduction are we talking about?
With the first two Laser upgrades and the first two Ballistics upgrades I end up with Cobalts doing 11 damage and Garda's doing 23. Do all ships other than fighters really take over 50% less damage from auto-cannons?
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Reply #4
archpsi
Join Date 02/2006
0
February 12, 2008 2:24:08 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
heres the info in spreadsheet format, anyway antiVeryLight is the damage type they do:
WWW Link
never noticed this, but LRM and the like take 100%
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Reply #5
cigaunt
Join Date 05/2006
0
February 12, 2008 2:33:09 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
Garda's come in handy when your foe shows up at your doorstep with a fleet full of carriers and light carriers (I'm looking at
YOU
TEC/Advent players
)
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Reply #6
Limz!
Join Date 02/2008
0
February 12, 2008 2:37:59 AM from
Sins of a Solar Empire Forums
This game follows a traditional RTS format, it doesn't matter what the upgrades do it matters what damage type you're flagged as and what armor you're going against.
Specifically armor types. I know there is an armor medium value in the game and probably light , capital , and heavy or I would guess at the very least. The damage values are the same and correspond to a table stating what the *real* damage is.
That being said, the game seems to have soft counters not necessarily hard counters which makes it even more interesting.
So Knighty4, the only way to find out is to dissect the files that have the damage information, then compare and contrast and you'll know what reductions you're up against and what bonuses you are granted when fighting against a certain thing.
Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
We're looking up the edits for this post...
Home
Sins of a Solar Empire
Strategy
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!
Sign Up Now!
View all recent posts
Mark all posts as read
•
Delete cookies created by the forum
•
Return to Top
Stardock Forums v1.0.0.0 #108436 walnut3 Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000062 Page Render Time: