I really don't see what the importance in having "Challenger" vs "Defender" status is, I mean it's not like you get bonus points or have a different starting position/resources when you're a "Challenger" as opposed to a "Defender"

If you could explain it to me that would be great.

Another idea would be to have the winner in green instead of in a seperate column, which would let you use the Victor column as a link to the replay instead.

@Jinn-
1. The 'challenger vs defender' is pretty much an academic thing at the moment. If things workout in the future this will not be the case. Nevertheless one should be able to easily walk way from the thread with a good idea of a clans competitive nature. Moreover there issues with the format capabilities of the forums that I have no control over and even the current layout looks like a maze.

2. Yeah green would be nice and it is there as part of the column header and it works well with the current format. As far as the replay thing, people cant seem to meet the minimum about of information requested already so to raise the bar even further and create lots of additional work for myself does not seem practical.

@Space -
I could ask the same question to you. Given the reporting format has always been listed yet you failed to follow it. I wont even get into the grammar and spelling issues however since I think it would be fruitless. Some words of advice, lets really try hard not to keep things above an interactive 3rd grade mentality level shall we?*

Anyway, apparently the formating changed the "M" from white text to black and I did not catch this as I was in a hurry when I updated things the first time and the severe wait time between edits for the forums at times is a bitch. So it was there just not the right color.

*rhetorical question

Moreover I hate to say it but i want to be perfectly clear, if the "Defender" vs "Challenger" thing is just meaningless paperwork at the moment, why even request that information? It's a waste of your time and mine.

@Jin - boy you're trying hard to be funny. I hate to say it, but the comment you are trying to debunk was not directed at you. However since you chose to respond to it...

Your rebuttal ads nothing new to the situation. Moreover the quote you used to justify your position is very poorly crafted to say the least. I did not want to get into it and tried to handle things delicately apparently I was to deft in my efforts. So I'll just be direct. The post is borderline juvenile quality and it was supposedly made by a 22 year old apparent native English speaker. Regardless of that the "link" does not work and even if it did I should NOT have to track down information. Discounting the banter and hyperbole that you used to try to make you point in opposition to my position, it still has not changed.

If you don’t like the fact I want reports to be organized, cogent and concise with a modicum of proper language use then lets simply agree to disagree.

Regarding your comment of having to "dig through pages of a thread" to find out what information I requested is way off base. The original post for this thread where the information is contained is at the top of each page in the thread. So you have lost me with that one.

Moreover on the issue of the dates I got "wrong" I guessed at what was what, since it was not clear, to me at least, at all which game(s) took place on what date. But please feel free to blame me if it makes you feel better.

Finally as my last remark if you believe you up to the task at hand then by all means please start your own chronicles thread and run it the way you want. This will be my last post on this matter. If there are any more such posts I shall consider them spam and report accordingly. Case in point, you could have edited your first response but you failed to do that for some reason and instead posted a string of them.

Is this thread still active?

Why is thing still sticky...