Allow me to raise this thread from the dead...
Carbon016,
Reading your posts on this thread, I'm fairly positive you couldn't achieve a stronger appearance of an arrogant, opinionated, ignorant pr!ck if you spent the next decade practicing.
In theory, you're right. If all you are ever going to do is play games, then you are better off with a Dual. But, really. Is that all you do? You watch any movies? Do any code? Multitask AT ALL with your computer?
Calling "gamers" who purchased a quad core "idiots" just makes you an idiot, when you use such callous statements with a broad brush. No, scratch that. It makes you a shortsighted, ignorant idiot.
Not only that, many of your "factual" statements are complete bullsh!t.
I'm going to save time, and quote you directly here:
1) "You do realize that no games currently utilize or require four cores"
YOU do realize that you don't know sh!t-all about what you're talking about, right? With 20 seconds on Google, I found a list 4 MONTHS prior to your quote above regarding games that can use 4 cores:
Bioshock, Company of Heroes, Crysis, Far Cry 2, Half-life 2: Episode 2, Hellgate: London, Lost Planet, MS Flight Sim X, Portal, Sup Com, etc etc... there's twice as many on that list as I wrote here.
2) "Yet even the latest Source games like Team Fortress 2 only utilize the second core for sound."
Spoken like a non programming tool. Do you have any idea how many CPU cycles audio processing can take up?
3) "If you buy a quad-core and do not work with quad-core optimized software like rendering video or CAD you have more money than you have brains, end of story."
This is YOUR opinion, and since you've already shown that you have a loose grasp of the facts, your opinion is about as useful (and lasting) as a tray of ice cubes in hell. For what it's worth, if you average out the cost per core, you get more for your month buying a Quad than a Dual.
Oh, and you should have said " ... rendering video, or CAD, or QUITE A FEW NEW GAMES COMING OUT you have more money than you have brains, end of story."
4) "the only reason someone would buy one is because they bought into hype."
Well, wait. Is that the only reason, or is the reason you mentioned above a reason? You're contradicting yourself, in the same post... same paragraph, really. Well, since your sentence structure is akin to that of a gorilla pounding both his ham fists onto a keyboard, and you don't use paragraphs, that's kind of a moot point.
5) "you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about."
Lol.. I actually laughed when YOU typed that.
6) "Like has been stated earlier in the thread, the quad will be useless now and useless in the future"
Stated by you, I might add. I'd like to reference my above comment regarding your opinion and ice cubes in hell again.
Ya know.. I could go on and on about your bullsh!t advice, but instead I'll just suggest people should NOT listen to you at all, and go read the forums at Toms Hardware, AnandTech, [H]ard|OCP, and the myriad other tech sites.
Hell, a 30 second "Q6600 vs E8400" Google search is better than listening to you spout your BS. You'll get some of the few actual "facts" you babbled on this thread, and half as much of your sh!tty elitist, know-it-all attitude.
-SS