Sins of a Solar Empire : Real-Time Strategy. Unrivalled Scale.
© 2003-2016 Ironclad Games Corporation Vancouver, BC. All rights reserved.
© 2006-2016 Stardock Entertainment
Sign Up | Lost Login?

Sins of a Solar Empire v1.14 Change Log

By Yarlen on February 19, 2009 7:48:40 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Yarlen

Join Date 01/2005
+228

Along with the next Entrenchment beta update we'll be releasing Sins of a Solar Empire v1.14 which contains the following changes:

-Area of effect repair abilities no longer autocast on undamaged, partially built structures.
-Clutter reduction on shield projector effect.
-Fix for Pervasive Economy exploit.
-New voices for the TEC Cobalt.
-Fixed a sync bug.
-Updated network commands to better sync with ICO.

Version 1.14 is now available via Impulse.

Locked Post 72 Replies
Search this post
Advanced Search
Subscription Options

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
3 Pages Jump to Page1 2 3 
Reply #1
Astax
Join Date 04/2003
+23
February 19, 2009 9:23:12 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

nice

does the network change fix replays?????

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #2
CreditSuisse
Join Date 10/2006
+22
February 19, 2009 10:02:35 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

no balance changes? doh.  

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #3
Astax
Join Date 04/2003
+23
February 19, 2009 10:08:25 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

HEY if they fixed replays, that would give us soem good solid data for discussion. 

Also 99% of the proposed carrier changes on this board are crazy and thank god they will be ignored by devs.  That is why I am not worried about the crazies much, otehr than to occasionalyl tell them they are crazy/wrong.  Final carrier tweaks will hit you all by suprise.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #4
DirtySanchezz
Join Date 03/2008
+96
February 19, 2009 11:36:14 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting ,
quoting post

-New voices for the TEC Cobalt.

 

Just please don't mess with the Marza voice.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #5
GoaFan77
Join Date 10/2008
+580
February 19, 2009 11:47:38 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting CreditSuisse,
reply 2
no balance changes? doh.  

 

Even if they didn't, we could just mod the exact same changes on our own. Though hopefully they added the whole extras (I'm tired of the stupid repair bot noise) and balances into the update, or at least in a new one following the final lauch of entrenchment.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #6
CreditSuisse
Join Date 10/2006
+22
February 19, 2009 11:49:39 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Astax,
reply 3
HEY if they fixed replays, that would give us soem good solid data for discussion. 

Also 99% of the proposed carrier changes on this board are crazy and thank god they will be ignored by devs.  That is why I am not worried about the crazies much, otehr than to occasionalyl tell them they are crazy/wrong.  Final carrier tweaks will hit you all by suprise.

I assume you consider yourself to be the 1% that's right. Like you're the one to talk, you posted on the beta 3 thread about not changing the carriers and 2 posters slammed you immediately thereafter. 

Give us a break. You probably know nothing about what the developer's are planning and oh yeah btw us 99% of players (you gave us that number, not me) who think there is a balance issue are right. 

If it were up to you you'd probably let Carriers get 5 strike craft, 100 more hp, capital ship armor and a DEATH RAY. rofl... sad really. 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #7
Hack78
Join Date 04/2008
+50
February 20, 2009 12:32:29 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

CreditSuisse - the issue still remains. The people who are not complaining about carriers are the recognised "pros" that everyone talks about. That means they can adaprt/handle it - so the other people are complaining due to a lack of understanding the nuinces of the game

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #8
Hack78
Join Date 04/2008
+50
February 20, 2009 12:38:40 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Yarlen - does 1.14 have the quick start options etc... mentioned in the latest beta change log?

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #9
-Ue_Carbon
Join Date 07/2008
+116
February 20, 2009 12:49:56 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Blair Fraser,
The 1.14 changelist is up as well. The engine is so different now and so many data formats have changed that its very difficult moving a lot of things back to original Sins. I won't be attempting to do any of the semi-complicated ones until Entrenchment is out the door and running well.

 

Im sure all the cool stuff like that is what he was talking about. But dont quote me.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #10
Astax
Join Date 04/2003
+23
February 20, 2009 1:52:25 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting CreditSuisse,
reply 6
Give us a break. You probably know nothing about what the developer's are planning

Correct.  I did not say I did.  I just know, from experience, that changes made don't reflect player's ideas most of the time, even if they reflect their desires.

99% of players (you gave us that number, not me) who think there is a balance issue are right.

I said 99% of suggestions. Suggestions != players.  Get glasses dude.

If it were up to you you'd probably let Carriers get 5 strike craft, 100 more hp, capital ship armor and a DEATH RAY. rofl... sad really. 
?

Nice pulling stuff out of your ass and claim I said it.  As a matter of fact I was against light carriers having more than 1 squadron when it was proposed about a year ago by a fellow makign a mod.  He made the mod to test it and came back and agreed with me.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #11
Mazuo
Join Date 07/2007
+17
February 20, 2009 3:13:59 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

I'll be in the tiny minority that will shed a tear and wave fondly goodbye to the old Cobalt voice.  Then again, I'll probably also like the new Cobalt voice even if it's unleashed as something far worse.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #12
ToJKa
Join Date 02/2008
+9
February 20, 2009 9:41:13 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

I like the old voice too, but looking forward to hear the new ones. I wish they'll re-voice the Vulkoras too.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #13
Greyfox2
Join Date 01/2009
+14
February 20, 2009 9:49:22 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

I am of the opinion that carriers are not really overpowered as I have stated in other threads.  The entrenchment update has changes on carriers and I will reserve judgement on slowed construction of SC with enemies in well until I see it tried more.  It sounds kinda crappy right offhand to be honest and encourages rushing to carriers to achieve air superiority.  It would sound like once someone has air superiorty with those changes then it would be difficult to win it back and would encourage one to build even more carriers to kill everything with after air superiority is achieved.  I may be wrong though in its implementation and it doesn't look to be a change in vanilla sins as of yet though.  Time will tell though.  The anti-carrier people should really learn how to play better against them though instead of griping.  They are very beatable as they stand now.  The game as it stands now takes balance, strategy, and thought.  It isn't just lrm spam or even carrier spam that wins the day.  Not that I am against potential changes to carriers or tweaks to other balance issues but things aren't so bad as creditsuisse/doriangray and others make it out to be.  They just need to learn how to use what they have available already.

[_]-Greyfox

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #14
Howdidudothat
Join Date 04/2008
+34
February 20, 2009 11:13:01 AM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

If the carriers do get nerfed, I will adjust my game play accordingly.  I really don't care from the standpoint that I will still win, no matter what "balance" changes are made, because I will use the units that work the best.

The only reason why I do care slightly is because the changes that are being made are going to make carriers as worthless as they were prior to v1.1 and I like having balanced fleets.

I will also say that the buff to the flak is badly needed.  They really should just buff the flak and leave the carriers alone.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #15
DirtySanchezz
Join Date 03/2008
+96
February 20, 2009 1:18:26 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

 

How, you make it sound like plans are in the works for nerfing carriers.  What are they planning to do?

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #16
Howdidudothat
Join Date 04/2008
+34
February 20, 2009 1:26:29 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

How, you make it sound like plans are in the works for nerfing carriers. What are they planning to do?

It's been a sad week.  Unemployment up, the G8 GXP is dead, and carriers are getting nerfed.

This is from the Entrenchment Beta 3 Change log (http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/340287):

-Carrier cruisers now suffer a strike craft build rate penalty if enemy combat units are in the same gravity well.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #17
Darvin3
Join Date 12/2008
+166
February 20, 2009 1:34:01 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

I wish they'll re-voice the Vulkoras too.

Seconded; that voice is FAR FAR more annoying than any other voice in the game.  I don't know why people complain about the Cobalt, you can randomly pick any Vasari unit (but Vulkoras especially) and it has a more annoying voice.

I literally have to play Vasari with headphones because other people in my house yell at me about how annoying the voice responses are.  I don't get that for any other game.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #18
TheSpydyr
Join Date 03/2008
+9
February 20, 2009 1:34:56 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Hack78,
reply 7
That means they can adaprt/handle it - so the other people are complaining due to a lack of understanding the nuinces of the game

So, they need to start adapting like the better players and quit using the same ole' tired excuse of "a lack of understanding the nuances of the game."

That seems pretty easy to me.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #19
TheSpydyr
Join Date 03/2008
+9
February 20, 2009 1:36:55 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Darvin3,
reply 17

I wish they'll re-voice the Vulkoras too.

Seconded; that voice is FAR FAR more annoying than any other voice in the game.  I don't know why people complain about the Cobalt, you can randomly pick any Vasari unit (but Vulkoras especially) and it has a more annoying voice.

I literally have to play Vasari with headphones because other people in my house yell at me about how annoying the voice responses are.  I don't get that for any other game.

I happen to love the voice for the Vas.  Absolutely love it when the wife and kids say, "God that voice is spooky."  Hell yeah it is...it's supposed to be.

Long live the Vas voice-overs!!!

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #20
d3vild0g
Join Date 04/2006
+1
February 20, 2009 2:20:54 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

and ahhh when can we expect the update has waited paitently all week for an update

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #21
RabidRabbit
Join Date 12/2008
0
February 20, 2009 2:48:02 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

NOOOOOOOOO

why the cobalts? what have they ever done to you?

seriously though, their voiceovers were awesome.  *high pitched voice: attaaaaaack!*

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #22
CreditSuisse
Join Date 10/2006
+22
February 20, 2009 2:50:31 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Quoting Hack78,
reply 7
CreditSuisse - the issue still remains. The people who are not complaining about carriers are the recognised "pros" that everyone talks about. That means they can adaprt/handle it - so the other people are complaining due to a lack of understanding the nuinces of the game

Does it still mean they can "cost-effectively" counter it? Can they counter it without using their own Carriers? 

People can counter carriers. They just need to jump thru 3 flaming hoops, balance 3 beer bottles on their arms, juggle 3 bowling pins while balancing on a uni-cycle. 

Also, you plain simply need 100% more micro than him, so what if! gasp, he is equal to you in micro than you still lose. 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #23
EvilTesla-RG
Join Date 08/2007
+21
February 20, 2009 3:04:15 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

What about mods?


Will they have to be changed at all?

 

 

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #24
Yarlen
Join Date 01/2005
+228
February 20, 2009 7:04:45 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

Due to major changes in the engine and data formats that Entrenchment uses as compared to regular Sins, many of the gameplay changes are not backwards compatible.  Blair has posted elsewhere that after Entrenchment is released he'll spend some time and see what changes he can backport.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
Reply #25
sinsboy
Join Date 05/2008
0
February 20, 2009 7:18:13 PM from Sins of a Solar Empire Forums Sins of a Solar Empire Forums

hey the update will not show on my impulse. i even clicked the stardock button and made it check for updates and i got nothin. is the update even out yet. plz help.

Reason for Karma (Optional)
Successfully updated karma reason!
3 Pages Jump to Page1 2 3 
View all recent posts
Mark all posts as read  •   Delete cookies created by the forum  •   Return to Top
Stardock Forums v1.0.0.0    #101114  walnut1   Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000469   Page Render Time: