Probably the IM generation, KWIM? |
I work at the company that makes this site. Trust me, older people using L337$p33k just doesn't work. If you want people to take what you say seriously, then you need to present it in a well written form. When chatting with friend on IM, sure, it's fine. But, when discussing major points in discussion forums, it just doesn't look good.
There is mention of them. Do you want me to show you? To do so I haveta (there I go again) quote a verse and that seems to be a no no around here. Say the word and I will... But ya I believe in the dinos. If I fill your hole here will you at least read the book? |
What makes you think that I have not read "the book"? It's a very typical "Christian" reaction to assume that if somebody doesn't agree then they must know nothing about the bible.
I know the scripture that you are talking about. It refers to tanniyn, behemoth and leviathan. Now, "behemoth" could easily be an elephant or hippo, and has even been translated to such *many* times. The description of this "creature" is simply too vague. People like to believe that the phrase "He is the first of the ways of God" must mean that the behemoth had to be larger than an elephant (or "largest creature", therefore it must have been a dinosaur, but that is all just wild interpretation.
Then there is tanniyn and leviathan, which are both described as fire breathing creatures. Their description is more like a tall tale than anything. Since when did dinosaurs swim in the sea and breath fire?
Of course, then you have the whole issue of man and animals being created on the 6th night, which was believed to be about 6,000 years ago (according to almost every published Christian work relating to the subject). With that in mind, how do we explain the oldest skull of a man which is 160,000 years old and the oldest dinosaur fossil which is 230 Million years old (found in Madagascar)?
But Kharma...where do you base this on? Where is your foundation? |
That would be "Karma" not "Kharma". I base it on my studies in spirituality. Don't assume that I have no base for my opinions. I have studied *many* religions and philosophies. I think that people are too quick to grasp onto the first thing that comforts them. Instead, I am living my life on a path to enlightenment. I am trying to see past all the organized brain washing and political agendas to find out what the truth really is. And, I don't think that it is the bible. Nobody can prove (or disprove) that the bible is the word of "god". For anyone knows it may be the work of the "devil" trying to lure the gullible away from the path to god.
I know that Christians don't like to look at it this way, but only about 1/3 of the world can be considered "Christian", and that is if you include Jehovah's Witnesses (which are classified as Christian even though they don't take Jesus as their saviour). So, what about the other 2/3 of the world? I guess they all must be wrong, right?
Christianity would be a lot easier to take if the bible was regarded as a handbook, not the pure word of god, and that it is not all knowing and all telling. Christianity has great teachings and moral standards (if followed), but the bible as the de facto word of "god" just doesn't work for me. There is too much interpretation by people and too much that just isn't right.
I have no problem with evolution. I think that it's a great thing. It means that the world was designed well since it can evolve and better itself.