Thrawn2787 Thrawn2787

Gas giant mystery...

Gas giant mystery...

K so we were on SDC and yarlen said hed answer a beta 3 question. We asked if gas giants were colinizable. Heres the script thingy. Can any 1 figure out what they do before thurday?




:33] <@Yarlen> You may not colonize gas giants.
[17:33] * thrawn2787 taps foot
[17:33]
90,086 views 89 replies
Reply #51 Top
Uh... quite hard to find something intelligible in all of this...
You guys sure your talking to each other, and not just grunting random words?


aparently you're not on IRC a lot, that is what its usually is like   

*yawn* I think I'm going to sleep in on Thursday. You guys can wait another week, right?


doh of course Yarlen is evil, he imprisoned the pink space ponnies and tourted them over IRC,   of course we were talking about SAW....

back on topic, will there be an over all game play change? because talking to Craig it seemed like otherwise things will stay the same, which is good (except for the phase inhibitor), but will there be a campaign or no?
Reply #52 Top
roflz


So you like the name?

And your in travler, just for seconding the name

You need to stop by IRC more often Schem, you miss too much.
Reply #53 Top
einstein's equations work with a variable that can be persieved very similar to the other spacial dimmentions

have you even read his works...

what "t" is is very well defined, it cannot be considered any other type of dimension.
Yes indeed if only we could harness the power of his confidence and utmost belief in his ability to be correct we could solve the worlds energy crisis, end poverty, cure all sickness, and travel to new worlds and start killing Other intelligent life!

oh stuff it, both of you. me being arrogant doesnt mitigate the fact that I have a rather bonified, well known scientist backing me up.
Reply #54 Top
You like totally missed my important post!!
Reply #55 Top
of course I second PS-piss
Reply #56 Top
Woot, chekc out our website its amazing.

pinkspaceponies.com
Reply #57 Top
oh, rock on!
Reply #58 Top
yes the t in einstiens EQs are well "defined" in eq terms but poorly understood on a deeper level... this isnt my oppinion, its what my physics professors tell me when im asking questions in class. i dont clame to be an expert, but i can resusitate info pretty well.
Reply #59 Top
I know I loved it too, just needs to have an Imperial symbol worked in there somewhere and its perfect.
Reply #60 Top
haha i cant get a freekin thing in on here with out several other posts going up
Reply #61 Top
yes the t in einstiens EQs are well "defined" in eq terms but poorly understood on a deeper level

that deeper level refering to quantum mechanics.


understanding the macro-description of einstien's theories are all but set in stone. they wouldnt be the basis for modern theory if it wasnt firmly grounded. "t" in terms of seconds is actually just 1/31536000 a lightyear in distance (which is a massive space) so einstein's theory has to do with the contraction of the universe viewed as a space-only existance, not a "space-time"

its very confusing, I cannot easily describe this to you, let alone on a forum.
Reply #62 Top
yes i agree... branded on its butt, like i said origanally   
Reply #63 Top
Leave this kind of discussion for off topic guys!! This thread is obviously for talking about the Pink Space Ponies behind, duh.
Reply #64 Top
speaking of which we need a thread for it...
Reply #65 Top
and i dont need you to explain it to me... i have professors to do that for me... whom have PhDs in the subject   and time on a quantum level is not what i was talking about... and since you seem to think you know so much ill stop trying to change your mind, i was trying to shed light not argue a point. Reality doesnt change just because some one thinks its a cirtain way. you obviously dont need my help in your understanding so ill just let you understand it the way you do.
Reply #66 Top
I'm done with people pulling the arrogance trip card...
Reply #67 Top
HAHA if you say so... and your calling me arrogant... nuff said
Reply #68 Top
Oh man, hope you dont turn into a hypocrit   
Reply #69 Top
I never said you were arrogant, I said you use the fact that I'm arrogant against me as a cheap way to avoid defending your point.

let me tell you one thing: just because people around you know what they're talking about, doesnt mean you do.
Reply #70 Top
Thats true, but then again their hindsight.
Reply #71 Top
hey, i was the one who admitted i dont know everything... i realize im still learning all this stuff. But i am learning from some pretty smart people, and that learning is pretty much my job right now.

anyway lets all just be happy.
Reply #72 Top
yarlen is back on IRC... and apparently... well here

[19:12]
Reply #73 Top
I learned this from an MIT professor... we're on the same ground a the least. so dont throw stones, my glass-house brother.
Reply #74 Top
and you went to MIT for physics? or you know a professor? just wondering, either way its impressive. and like i said im not trying to argue my oppinion. i was just trying to help shed light were it seemed light needed sheding... but like i also said, looks like you got plenty in your direction so ill stop.
Reply #75 Top
Oh why dont you both drop it