brn4meplz brn4meplz

Akkans Ion shot

Akkans Ion shot

I looked on the forums for a Post containing this but could not find on, so here goes.

Has anyone else had the Problem of the Akkans Ion shot not doing what it says it does?
If the enemy cap ship is sitting still in space it does seem to freeze it's shots for a little bit, but As my Allie in a 2vs2(Scyn) found out yesterday it didn't actually stop the enemy ship from moving. Allowing the enemy Kol to catch up, which resulted in the death of his Akkan unfortunately. Now we still won the game through use of tactics and well timed coordination(if i ever figure the best method for sharing a Replay I will)


But having said that it bring up my next argument. Why are Kol's the fastest capital ship, traditionally speaking Battleships are one of the slowest vessels, I mean thats why they invented a class of ship called a battlecruiser-relatively front line sustainability but faster.
11,457 views 32 replies
Reply #26 Top
Karma, i believe he asks because if you are not a beta tester for this particular game you may have less experience with it than those who have been testing it from beta one and have more experience with the ships and weapons at our fingertips.
Reply #27 Top
Ironic... do you know why he asked that question? No you don't. Yet your presume to answer for him when you don't know... and inform me that I shouldn't give my opinion about a game because some people might know marginally more about it then I do.


If you took your own advice you wouldn't have answered for him. Yet you did...


Why don't you let people give their opinions about stuff without getting all snarky about how much they've played. Most of these ideas are valid regardless of time played as they're immediately obvious. If you have a problem with a specific comment then cite it. We can talk about it. There's no need to start trying to shut people out of discussions... in fact, it's actually rather rude.


When they start handing out beta tester diplomas and everyone else has one but me, then you can talk... until then your position is frankly laughable.
Reply #28 Top
lol, snarky
Reply #29 Top
Ironic... do you know why he asked that question? No you don't. Yet your presume to answer for him when you don't know... and inform me that I shouldn't give my opinion about a game because some people might know marginally more about it then I do.

careful, your petty bastard is showing.

and why shouldnt your voice carry as much weight? because you dont see how things play out. any length of time with near complete dissablement (which is what ion is, excluding, apparently, shields) is disasterous with these fleet sizes.

not a lot less weight, but less nonethe...less.
Reply #30 Top

careful, your petty bastard is showing.

Ironic as well...

and why shouldnt your voice carry as much weight?

Did anyone ask you that question? Or did you just ask yourself the question because you wanted to answer it?

Here's a question why should I respect your opinion on this issue?

*crickles*


Exactly.

File that one away and remember it for the future the next time you feel like giving me advice.



As to what I said not making sense with larger fleet sizes, why not just say that instead of acting like a jerk?


Is it really so hard to politely say that a given idea doesn't work with larger fleet sizes? Apparently... and apparently you feel no shame at calling me a "petty bastard" among other things while you're at it. Pity that...


Now, if we're done brow beating each other, I'd like to talk about the game mechanics instead of compare penis sizes with a bunch of idiots on the internet.
Reply #31 Top

*crickles*


you have the funniest words... also, did you just add silence into your own forum post?

and WHY ARE YOU COMPARING PENIS SIZES WITHOUT ME!?!?!?!
Reply #32 Top
Okay, I think this thread is done...