You guys know once I get my God box resurrected I'm going to give Multi a run for the money.

Anyway, nice stuff some of those images should be on a few of the reviews on other sites (as well as this one in the media section) so people become true believers thus Sinners!

Good luck on that

lol awesome
*puts one of the pics as desktop background*

this make anyone think of making an enders game mod??

but this says something though, the game engine gotta be a very stable one.

You obviously never played Supreme Commander, which can handle up to 16 cores at once. Not very efficiently past the first 4 mind you, but it can use them all. And with a player made Core Thread tweaking utility it will use up to 8 cores very effectively.

But you're right that very few games use multiple cores effectively. But there are a few out there.

^Strange that.
My mate with a quad core plays sup com, it only ever max's out a single core, my laptop's dual core is only ever at 50% too (1 core)
It is an even crappier game if it supports 16 cores, but not 2 or 4

This alone could have made me buy the game. Lol.

Not really, there isn't enough there in the space parts.

It does, but it lets Windows do the distribution, AMD DualCore drivers actually make that work a little better than the Intel version. Core 0 is maxed out almost immediately. Look around the GPGnet forums for Boris' Core Maximizer, that will redistribute the threads for SupCom much more effeciently than the game itself does. The multi-threading of SupCom isn't as high as it could be, since then it wouldn't run on single core CPUs. And since distributing of the threads is left to Windows, most of it will end up on Core 0 rather than the others. That little prog fixes that, i've had huge games where i was looking at close to 90% load on both my CPUs cores.

Then something must be really wrong on your PC i guesss, as i both played the beta and full version of supcom and it DOES use all 4 cores. Its been some time since i played it the last time but as i recall it used 90%, 50%, 50% and 10-20% on the last core.

lol, You just blame it on my system.
1) Its on a laptop for me (dual core) so it runs like poo (10fps on lowest graphics)
2) Its on my mates server, quad core, and never hits the second core
3) It runs fine on my sole core 2.0ghz, full graphics no lag, 30fps.
4) its a crap game anyways, it takes 80mins to build a ship, stupid game!

4) 80min i can build a "fatboy" in like 20sec you just gotta get your economy right.

lol maybe so.
5) TO fricken complicated to get a grasp on, looses peoples interests
6) Runs like poo for its graphics
7) Looks ugly
8) Feels ugly
9) TO heavy on the system (A waste of 8GB, 2 - 3GB on movies!)

My hat's off to you multi. I just can't bleave the swarm I am staring at... I just don't know what to say other then wow. Please don't sqwish me! LOL

hehe just remember this was done in beta 3, imagen how stable the engine is at release

<----- Wet's self. Lol I can't honestly. I didn't even think it was posibel to get 10k ships to begin with. What's next? a full 100k?

... I don' think my heart could take it. LOL

First thing I thought: "Our ships will blot out the sun!"

I have the full version of sins does anyone know wich file and what i must change in order to build lots of capital ships.

LOve it...I can already see some cool scenarios playing out...invading armada argh...

These pictures are beautiful.

We are Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

What type of hardware? You running on.

I would rule any world in just a few seconds

yoU should name it "locust mod" (the insect)