Just bought Sins but I have win2k and it will not let me install

sent email asking for refund but could I get it working?

Any other win2k users can I get this game working or do I just get my money back?

Xtanto
7,888 views 16 replies
Reply #1 Top
erm , apparently you CAN get it to work on WIN2K... use search there was a post here today that someone gave instructions on how to do it.
Reply #2 Top
Well if it works for win2k I would like to install and play I have gal civ2 and all the expansions and they never asked for winXP. Also Win2k and XP are nearly the same!
Reply #3 Top
Read this thread, should be a workaround some where in it.

Windows 2000
Reply #4 Top
If there isn't a workaround, I don't see how the OP is entitled to money back, the specs both online and on the box clearly state that WinXP SP2 is the minimum software supported.
Reply #5 Top
Still easier support for 2k would be nice..then I could sin at school.. ;x
Reply #6 Top
I have many games that say windows XP supported but they all work on win2k. Really there is almost no difference between XP and 2k except the skin that makes it look like XP was made for children.

Also I am sure that stardock will refund me as the order has not even been sent yet. I ordered the box to be sent to the UK and just tried the download as it would be quicker than to wait.

It does state that XP and vista are supported but it does not state that they have added a flag to prevent installs on windows 2000.
Reply #7 Top
From what I've heard, Win 2000 is pure evil. I've never seen a PC with it installed personally, but that's going too off topic.
Reply #8 Top
Heflys you may be thinking of windowsME, windows 2000 is NT5.0 and windows xp is NT5.1 practically the same.
Reply #9 Top
I heard it (2000) was highly prone to viruses, or something.
Reply #10 Top
XP when it first came out (XP Professional version that is) was in fact really close to the NT Kernel since it was based off of it. However, after 2 service packs (about to be 3 with even more Vista features yoinked back into XP) they are substantially different. Also, I think Windows 2000 is not even supported at all by Microsoft any more with updates any more so it is definitely a security concern for people still using it.
Reply #11 Top

I heard it (2000) was highly prone to viruses, or something.
End of quote


Not really. Win 2000 was about the most stable OS Microsoft ever came out with. Still very solid. Win XP was simply Win 2000 with a modified UI for the home market after the ME disaster.

Besides, *every* Windows version is highly prone to viruses and stuff if you don't patch it and you are stupid and open attachments and stuff. ;)

Reply #12 Top
I wrote a small tutorial on how to get it to work based off what people said on the matter on these forums. The topics over here.
Reply #13 Top
If there isn't a workaround, I don't see how the OP is entitled to money back, the specs both online and on the box clearly state that WinXP SP2 is the minimum software supported.
End of quote

Reading posts like this makes me glad I didn't buy the game.

Win 2000 was about the most stable OS Microsoft ever came out with.
End of quote

It's the most stable desktop Windows (not sure about 2003), and it's the fastest one that still works. Because of that many companies that actually test their OSes (Bosch NA, for example) still use only 2000 for their workstations.
Reply #14 Top
BTW works fine on my windows 2000 for Gamblers info.
Reply #15 Top
Yep, runs great! Just follow RiderRockon's guide and you'll be good to go. Another Win2K holdout here and Sins runs solid for me. You can download the patches from the site...they install and run fine for me.

Have fun!
Reply #16 Top

Just note for those still reading... the game of year eddition does NOT normally install on win2k. It demands xp. :(

And here I got all excited I could play it tonight without having to break down and install XP. Guess I'll have to try some of the harder work arounds.

Also- the link to that guide does not seem to work for me.. claims I don't have rights to view that or some such foolishness.