Hi,
I just saw Sins in Best Buy and was about to pick it up whern I noticed the minimum requirements for the graphics card. It said GEoforce 6600 3D with 128 MB.
I have a GEOforce 5200 with 256MB (no 3D though)
Do you think that's OK, or is the lack of "3D" a deal breaker?
Thanks,
B.
OT: I really hope GalCiv2 TA doesn't have that same requirement... or I'm in trouble.
That lack of a 3D wasn't a dealbreaker... but being a 5200 is. (If your interested in my specific answer to your problem, rather than a "lecture" on computer parts, skip to last paragraph)
Quick run down on how video cards work (roughly).
XXX xyzz (aa) XMB
XXX is the type name -- Nvidia or ATi. the xyzz is a series of numbers. The first number, the x, is the series / generation number. Basically, it pegs the card to a rough "family". The lower than number is, the older -- and therefore less capable -- the card. The second number, the y, is a descriptor of the cards capabilities, or its intended "audience". 500 is bare minimum for gaming applications -- anything lower than that is intended for word documents and the like. It may run the game, but it probably lacks the power to do so decently (e. g. low, frequently unplayable, framerates). The final numbers, the zz, generally aren't used -- are left at 00 -- but can be used to indicate an incremental improvement. The (aa) is a series of letters used to further modify the card. I don't have a list of the exact modifiers, some are better than others, but ones like "go" (used for mobile cards) and "LE" (used for really sucky cards, hence the term "lame edition) generally indicate reduced -- or
greatly reduced in the case of the LE -- preformance. The XMB is, of course, the memory of the card.
Video card memory is not the major indicator of performance. Let me say that again: higher memory does not automatically indicate higher performance. In fact, memory is one of the places video card manufacturers
love to inflate, to convince you to buy an inferior card.
Think of it this way: even a computer with a terrabyte of memory is
still going to suck if you happen to have a P4 in it. The processor just can't hack it -- and all that memory is going to "waste" because you just don't have a processor strong enough to make good use of it.
That said... the Geforce 5000 series (the FX line) is widely known to have been one of Geforce's greatest mistakes. A complete and utter flop, the way the 5000s support many of their "supported" features (notably pixel shaders) is so inefficient as to be useless.
If I were you, I'd upgrade my computer ASAP to something better (give us a budget, and we'll be happy to steer you right, me especially -- I'd need to know more about your system before I can tell you if a replacement model or "just" a new video card is in line, however). If that isn't an option (and I recognize that many lack the funds to upgrade computers, even when they are way out of date), then I'd suggest you wait for the demo before making a decision, and see how it runs on your computer. I don't think there is any experiential data on how a 5200 will run this game -- but just looking at the number, the answer is "not well". Whether you can "hack" how poorly the card runs the game is something only you can decide.