Stardock will be closed for the week starting on Monday, June 29th and we will be returning on Monday, July 6th. We will be monitoring support tickets and forums during this time but expect delays in responses during this time.
GalCiv2 Forums
Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?
Banned because I can't help the occasional neologism fit.
I'd start a b*og on making up words, but that's one of the ugliest new pseudo-words of the last decade. Especially since the idiot 'professionals' started adding b*og sections to their web sites. Now you can't assume a b*og is an amateur journal, you have to check whether it's actually 'journalism' that's been shat through a low-cost goose that provides no copy editing or fact checking.
banned for breakfast.
And I think Star Trek had a lot of issues. Go to HowItShouldHaveEnded.com and watch their version. Hilarious.
And the script blew from the get go.
banned for hating the new revamped actionized dumb down star warsized Star Trek
banned for he only needed one part: 'star warsized'.
I enjoyed the original Star Wars movies, so don't get me wrong when I say that it's an action sci-fi to appeal to the mainstream. It is not Star Trek. The idea to force one into the realm of the other is painful, at best.
Banned because Star Wars is awesome.
Although I do agree with you, the two should not mix.
The Admiral
banned for not wanting to throw in Jelly.
At least one guy gets my take on it.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
Sins Forums