Enforcers vs. other two
Heavy Cruiser Hierarchy
I've noticed that a lot of people seem to like Kodiaks and Destras more that Enforcers because of the higher bang for buck (sorry for that cliche). But wouldn't the higher amout of ship strength (shields and hull), about 230 more from Kodiak to Enforcer, lead to more firepower in the long term? That makes no sense, so I'll give an oversimplified example. If say two skirmishers (blue) are fighting one enforcer (red), and say that the enforcer has exactly twice the amout of hp and dps that the skirmishers have, (and forgetting shield mitigation since the mitigation for different types of hcs, as I will connect this example with later, have the same shield mitigation as each other), the enforcer would win every time. As soon as the first skirmisher is destroyed, the blue team's total firepower is halved. Without minutae like ship turning time, the enforcer would have about 1/4 of its health left after both skirmishers are destroyed. This all relies on the fact that firepower doesn't decrease as damage taken increases. In battles with HC vs HC, the situations aren't as extreme, but I assume they would have the same effect. On large scales, it could make a difference. But maybe the time added for the enforcers to turn to fight another ship would make up for this difference. I'm not quite sure how to (or I'm to lazy to) do all the math, but what do people who are more experienced that me think about this?