Quoting CaptainAanderson,
Personally, having owned an x38 and x48, i like it a lot better. It does much better with overclocking and it hasnt held back my core 2 quad yet, unlike the x48. Tell me kronik, what mobo do you have?
If you are really a performance whore, stop playing with desktop motherboard... i have a two year old server motherboard who have the double of performance that a more new i7 975 processor/motherboard...
By example, a 3.0 GHz Core 2 Quad system using dual-channel 1066 MHz DDR3 achieved only 6.9 GB/s for memory transfer... Intel quickpath interconnect in the extreme edition of the i7 reach a bandwidth of 12.0 GB/S using triple-channel 1066 MHz DDR3... My old 5000X chipset use a quad serial channel interlaced memory connection and i have old FB dim ddr2 667 ( who can be upgrade to 1333 if i wish )... with these configuration, i reach a 32gb/s for memory transfer... because of the quad channel and the interlease, i need to use 8 of my 16 ram slot ( i have 8 time 2gb ram)...
My "mobob" is like a top MAC pro who have a tag price of 15000 euro... building myself a similar "mobob" have allow me to spare 10000 euro... case and mother board from supermicro, two quad core xeon, 16 gb ram, 8x500 gb samsung ( i am in the process to change them to 8x1TB ), two SAS drive for OS, blue ray, nvidia 8800 Ultra 768 mb, etc...
Somewhere on these forum, there is a topic related to benchmark... i have beat everybody, same the more recent "mobob"... and this without any overclocking... simply using the cheaper server board that i have found...
Maybe in a few year, when more modern desktop computer will be my computer, i will upgrade the processor and ram to 1333... but until now, i have not yet feel the need... what is good with server board, is that socket for processor don't change each 6 month... so, in the long term it is a cheap computer...