Which Planetary Bombardment Weapon?
Which planetary bombardment weapon would cause more civilian and environmental damage?
Which planetary bombardment weapon would cause more civilian and environmental damage?
nukes
OMG, for the love of god please stop
![]()
It's irrelevant which would cause more civilian/environmental damage because:
1. There's no stupid environmentalists in Sins. Everyone knows that they were all killed in the PETA wars (J/K).
2. Each weapon system is destructive in its own right, and really doesn't need to be analyzed like this.
3. It's a game mechanic, for a game. That's it. Deal with it, or play something else.
I concur Zombies.
If you guys don't like it, stop answering him.
He isn't hurting anything, and personally I find some of his questions interesting.
so BUG OFF!
Sorry, was just feeling a little humorous since he already asked this question.
Yeah, they are pretty close. I got more annoyed at Whiskey144 than at you to be honest when I finally spouted off. You were just standing too close to the target.
Ya, I shouldn't have hit "Post Reply" (usually don't in these cases). It's my fault if anything as I started the negative banter even if it was intended as harmless fun at the time.
I'm somewhat amused by his flurry of questions, but I do have to agree that it crosses the line to spam when he asks the same question twice and makes a new thread for it.
My apologies if I've angered anyone.
i agree with ryat
Game play wise it doesnt matter but looking at it from a factional point of view the TEC nukes. Next would be the vasari and lastly the advent.
Tec outright use brute force, cant get any more than that with nukes.
Vasari have advance precise weapons. They can target whatever with accuracy.
Advent suck only because they want a change in people opinions (and revenge) why kill population unless you have too...
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.