Sweet. The AI progressions from Vanilla to Trinity were already a quantum leap. I remember playing diplomacy after a few updates and having the AI run a two pronged attack against me, test weaker defenses etc. They still sometimes will fly straight into an Argonev however. I am looking forward to an ever smarter aggressor in Rebellion.

EEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

"We’re also working on a way to share maps, but more info on this will have to come later."

"We’re still looking into multiplayer enhancements but hope to implement some form of auto-matching or player ranking system."

Wow...that tells me nothing.

Will there be changes to fleet management? I would like to be able to easily add and remove ships from a fleet & select which ship is to be the fleet leader. Basically, will there be any changes to the way fleets and ships are ordered around?

There are no plans to change this presently. It’s already possible to add/remove ships from a fleet and select a new fleet leader using the existing features and a couple keys.

 

...

JCD-Bionicman ... you have heard of Age of Empires 2 right?

Development is development.  If it's what the players want, then it doesn't matter who does it, as long as it get's done.

AI scripting is one of the hardest things to do and get right.  The development team has to focus on a lot of different things, and can only follow a game for so long after it's release before they have to get to work on other projects.  The more time they spend on AI, the more other parts suffer, the more they spend on the other parts, the less goes into the AI.  Making the AI script-able, mod-able, changeable by modders and players of the game allows for a far superior AI to be created.  Imagine what we'd have right now almost 4 years after the initial release of Sins if the AI was script-able from the very beginning?  It wouldn't be on par with a human player who camps out on ICO most days, but after 4 years of free development by the community, the official developers could take what works and use it with their own tweaks and then send it all back out to us to continue working on.  Having 15 people working on a piece is far superior to having 2 people.

If you think turning something over to a large community of people who are just as talented, just as creative, and just as devoted as official team members (albeit unpaid) is foolish or stupid or never as good, then I hope you never have to supervise anyone or run a business.  Free labor is a beautiful thing.  Free tech support is a beautiful thing.  Free publicity is a wonderful dream.  Free upgrades to your game that get more people to buy it years after release is a godsend.

Mods may not be the solution to everything, but they sure as hell can fill in the gaps, and can definitely improve upon what was given to the community.  This is true for all games.  After you've memorized these words, chisel them into a rock.  After you've chiseled them into a rock, place the rock in your strongest hand, or perhaps both, and proceed to hit yourself in the skull with it.  With luck, perhaps you will serve as an example to the rest of the community and this message will finally sink in to the rest of the world and generations of forum users to come.

Lol? How about backing up your belief with rational argument instead of moronic insults?

The reason I support the modders as I do is that they have proven many times that they are extremely technically capable. They have collectively created an amazing amount of content in hundreds of mods, not to mention the graphic design and balancing attempts. They know how the game works and how to make modifications to improve it - and are quite good at what they do.

The developers, on the other hand, often take a long time to do things... to take a very simple example, how long did it take for the Illuminator bug to get fixed? More than a year, was it? And compare the amount of content released through Diplomacy and Entrenchment and compare it to the amount of new content a random Sins mod could add. Modders have the time and ability to put in to fix and create things; the developers are constantly working for a paycheck, and are mostly involved with other projects.

If the developers opened up the core of Sins even more to modders (such as for improving the AI, or more control over the UI), the modders WOULD be able to make improvements on the current system of things. Through a mod, at least.

All this said, a mod alone is not going to be enough to actually fix the problems, because mods are not official, and only the few players who know about it will be able to play like that (and only with each other). My argument is that if the developers give the modders more access to core Sins functionality, the modders would be able to make significant improvements to the way things are, and (hopefully) the developers would simply give an "OK" and then copy/paste the code to go into the official game.

If you disagree please explain why instead of just telling me to hit myself with a rock, please?

Well that's extremely unfortunate.

I would think that crowdsourcing software would be quite effective (for the software itself) even if it isn't profitable...

Thank you!  Been playing for YEARS and did not know i could do that!

Lead ship is important because it will determine how close your fleet should stay together and if that lead ships jumps out of battle, then your fleet jumps out.

This has seemed to be the case any time the issue has arrived. When there is money involved, even a simple 'You can have it for free' contract can often easily be overturned in court. It's all about the company watching their backs, whether they like it or not. That's how money works.

I approve this troll.  He's consistent.