Draginol Draginol

I’m not trying to dog-pile Windows 8 here…

I’m not trying to dog-pile Windows 8 here…

Update: We've made a Start button for Windows 8 that brings up a Start menu. Click here to sign up.

 

image

So here’s my Metro desktop.  Now, I’ve only been using Windows since v2.1 so maybe I’m missing a few things like…

1) How do I sort the tiles?

2) How do I organize them into groups?

3) How do I change the size of tiles?

4) How do I change the color?

These aren’t customization requests, these are basic organizational features people expect.

I like the Metro style. So I’d love to be able to color code tiles based on how I might use them.  Intuitively, I’d expect to be able to drag select (or shift select or ctrl select) a bunch of tiles, right click and choose various options. Except, there are no context menus. Instead, you get an option to unpin or uninstall at the bottom of the screen – great for tablet use but not real useful here.

Android and iPhone users are used to being able to put their stuff in folders/groups/whatever.  What about here?  This seems pretty basic stuff.

The tech is good

Here’s the maddening part, Windows 8 is the best version of Windows yet – technologically. WinRT is great. The memory optimization they’ve done is fantastic. It’s faster. It’s smoother. But it’s also unusable for trying to get a lot of work done. 

This isn’t a case of “just get used to it”. There’s not a lot to get used to. This would be akin to taking away the keyboard on a tablet/smart phone and telling people to just use a stylus to draw what they want and accuse them of not “giving it a chance” when they complain.

What’s the usage case?

In Product design, we typically create use cases. How we expect people to use what we’re making.  I honestly can’t see what their use cases for this is.  How is a user seriously supposed to do serious production work if all the “new” apps are full screen with no quick way to switch between them? 

And I’m not talking about power user stuff here, I’m talking what is the use case of someone who is trying to use Power Point, Word, and Excel together in a Metro environment?

image

That is an example of an app (the reader app).  The back button does not take you out of the app. It’s disabled. To get out of the app, you move your mouse to the top left or bottom left of the screen.

To switch between your running apps you move your mouse to the top left and then to the side:

image

And you get a list of tiles.

Now, again, I am not trying to beat up on Windows 8 here. I would like one of the Windows 8 fans to make the case on how that metaphor is faster or better or more intuitive than the case where I could have all 3 apps up on the screen at once.  Note that I used the word OR.  You don’t even have to make the case for all 3.  Just one of them would be fine.

Heck, even my Iphone is easier to switch apps than this (double tap and pick the app).

image

And the PC is not designed to run everything full screen. How many people choose to run everything full screen?

It’s not all doom

The problem with Windows 8 isn’t technical. It’s political. Someone, way at the top, almost certainly over the cries of developers and designers, is insisting on this.  Here’s why I say this:

  1. They could easily let the Windows desktop load Metro apps in a window, on the Windows desktop. How do I know that? Because we’ve already done it internally here. So it’s definitely doable. So why not? Why force desktop users into Metro when the current Metro experience is a big step back for 90%+ of PC desktop users?
  2. A lot of the problems with the Metro experience boil down to trying to treat the mouse as surrogate for a giant pointer finger. Hence, no context menus – no menus whatsoever. These could be overcome by treating the mouse as a different class of input device.
  3. There is technically no reason to force users into Metro to launch apps or to interact with Metro apps. Under the covers, they’re just full screen windows.

A warning to the fan community

You’re not doing Microsoft any favors by shouting down people’s complaints with Windows 8’s consumer preview. I have a vested interest in the success of Windows 8.  Professionally, I need Windows 8 to be a huge hit.   I can tell you straight out, unless these things are addressed, few enterprises will move to this and few consumers will voluntarily move to it.  And in an age where “Getting a new Dell” is no longer automatic, those Mac Airbooks start to look compelling to a lot of consumers – and it will be a lot more familiar to use than the current Windows 8 experience.

131,009 views 55 replies
Reply #26 Top

Crazy 8sI'm almost never actually IN Metro, I just use it mostly as a start menu.  It's been changed since then (I had double pinned some stuff and hadn't added my other apps and so on.)  The general usability is lacking in the app department so far, so I mostly ignore all that.  Removed Solitaire for obvious reasons and the Xbox stuff since there just isn't enough usefulness there yet.  And Finance, since, gasp, I don't own stocks.

Really my only complaint as I probably mentioned is the Metro apps are just not very good.  I don't even know how the Pictures app sorts but I can't seem to change it back to by file name.  Mail won't get any mail older than a week ago, perhaps because I'm almost always downloading and don't spend long in the app.  The rest is pretty meh too.  I like Pictures and Reader most, whether P* could be improved or not.  I don't even use a calendar at the moment so I could see that being useful since I'm stepping up my volunteer efforts.

The messaging app is easy on the eyes but the layout just isn't very good.

Anyway I think I'm done beating dead horses when it comes to 8.  Obviously a lot of you guys hate it and that doesn't really concern me.  I just think once you get used to how it operates it's pretty damn nice, and yes I use a mouse and keyboard...come to think of it I should see how Kinect works with win8 too.

So anyway, I'm off to do more important things.  Just finished Assassin's Creed: Revelations...onward!

Reply #27 Top

brad... dosent one of those tiles or something have an option so you can use the normal startmenu like we do now?

i forget who posted it, but someone here posted a link to a long video about windows 8, and one of the presenters on the video pressed something on the screen and the normal startmenu appeared.....

and if so.... can we still be able to skin that and just skip the metro if need be ?

 

Reply #28 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 2
But yea, it's quite a few steps. You have to move your mouse to the bottom right, which pops up the charms bar, then pick settings and then shut down.
End of Frogboy's quote

Ok, i have never use any menu option for shutdown my computer... i find strange to click "start" on win xp for being able to shutdown...

I am from the prehistoric generation who use the power on/off button on the computer itself... a short push for a shutdown, a push of 3 second for a power-off... is it win8 disabling these hardware button ???

Reply #29 Top

Quoting Savyg, reply 26
Obviously a lot of you guys hate it and that doesn't really concern me.
End of Savyg's quote

Savyg .... Stardock [and Wincustomize] is peopled by people [how odd] that are pre-occupied with the Windows GUI.  It's their/our bread and butter. [Most] all else is secondary.

WHEN a new OS is shown to be clunky and disfunctional it flies in the face of 'what we do'.

You are literally GUARANTEED to find a groundswell of dissatisfied people here.... probably more-so than any other site on the net...;)

Reply #30 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 29
WHEN a new OS is shown to be clunky and disfunctional it flies in the face of 'what we do'.
End of Jafo's quote

Is it though?

Old start menu takes what one, two, three, possibly four clicks to get to a program that isn't in the top six.

New start menu takes two once you've pinned your fav apps to it.  And of course you can pin to the taskbar just like with 7.

It's just different, it's hardly dysfunctional.  And the admin tools being quick to get to will save me a crapload of time when I need that stuff, which isn't that uncommon since I change my disk layouts every so often, set up symbolic links and stuff like that!  (I used to disable my NIC a lot when I plugged the modem in directly, but I don't think I need to bother plugging the new modem in directly.)

At any rate, I don't feel like talking about this all week I just love it.  So hopefully my last post on the subject.

Reply #31 Top

Quoting Thoumsin, reply 28
Quoting Frogboy, reply 2But yea, it's quite a few steps. You have to move your mouse to the bottom right, which pops up the charms bar, then pick settings and then shut down.

Ok, i have never use any menu option for shutdown my computer... i find strange to click "start" on win xp for being able to shutdown...

I am from the prehistoric generation who use the power on/off button on the computer itself... a short push for a shutdown, a push of 3 second for a power-off... is it win8 disabling these hardware button ???
End of Thoumsin's quote

 

HAHA read page 1 and this is the funniest comment so far  :thumbsup:   Lula´s wearing that gun pretty deep down isnt she lol
would also like to add : "CP Beta" it is made for a purpose

Reply #32 Top

 

Next big thing : Metro Explorer. Ooops, they left some artifacts in. ;-)

Reply #33 Top


Windows 8 is Microsoft's giant overreaction to mobile computing (iOS, Android, tablets, smartphones, etc). They are paranoid about becoming irrelevant and so they are doing what they always do, try to shoehorn an everything-fits-all solution into Windows. They want Windows to be the one-stop solution for everything. Unfortunately, it's not a very good fit. They have made this mistake over and over in the past. You'd think they'd learn by now. They make good products but that company badly needs new top management.

Reply #34 Top

What he said.

Reply #35 Top

Quoting Zubaz, reply 18

Quoting voo, reply 16It doesn't even feel like an Operating System. It feels like some interactive corporate powerpoint presentation.

 

Voo!!!

End of Zubaz's quote

 

:thumbsup:

 

Quoting MadDeez, reply 24
VOO!!!!
End of MadDeez's quote

 

I don't know him. *_* *looks at Pasley* 

 

 

Quoting C0LDsteel, reply 33

Windows 8 is Microsoft's giant overreaction to mobile computing (iOS, Android, tablets, smartphones, etc). They are paranoid about becoming irrelevant and so they are doing what they always do, try to shoehorn an everything-fits-all solution into Windows. They want Windows to be the one-stop solution for everything. Unfortunately, it's not a very good fit. They have made this mistake over and over in the past. You'd think they'd learn by now. They make good products but that company badly needs new top management.
End of C0LDsteel's quote

 

Smartphones are a lot more elegant than this though. Saying that, elegance has never been on Microsoft's side.

Reply #36 Top

Off topic: Voo - irc.stardock.com still works old friend.  use it!

Reply #37 Top

I miss Ian (Voo)

Reply #38 Top

I miss Pas.   ;)

Reply #39 Top

I’m not trying to dog-pile Windows 8 here…
End of quote

Microsoft needs no help in doing this... it has done more than an adequate job itself.

Quoting C0LDsteel, reply 33
Windows 8 is Microsoft's giant overreaction to mobile computing (iOS, Android, tablets, smartphones, etc). They are paranoid about becoming irrelevant and so they are doing what they always do, try to shoehorn an everything-fits-all solution into Windows. They want Windows to be the one-stop solution for everything. Unfortunately, it's not a very good fit. They have made this mistake over and over in the past. You'd think they'd learn by now. They make good products but that company badly needs new top management
End of C0LDsteel's quote

It missed the boat with smart phones and tablets, so Microsoft thinks it is making up ground by making Win 8, as you say, a one-stop solution to everything, but it is the biggest mistake MS has ever made, IMHO.  It is the mistake that will make MS become irrelevant. With Win 8 multi-tasking has become a thing of the past [what with the one app open at a time kind of thinking in Metro], so the majority of desktop users will reject it outright, and not just the power users.  Even ma and pa users will want to be able to surf the net, chat in Messenger and compose a letter while listening to music, etc, so it's pretty much dead in the water as far as regular users go. 

It may suit a person who spends 24/7 on Facebook, or somebody who hasn't mastered anything above a smartphone, but it certainly will not measure up for me.

:thumbsdown:

Reply #40 Top

I am a little behind the times when it comes to computers, though I will probably migrate from XP to Windows 7, even though it annoys me a lot, when I build a proper computer of my own. This is my parent's computer that is nearly ten years old. And I won't even bother with Windows 8 unless it gets a redesign, because it clearly doesn't work very well for traditional PC use in its present state from what I am seeing. Microsoft definitely needs to get their act together asap, unless they want to shoot themselves in the foot, which will happen if Windows 8 doesn't get a redesign.

Reply #41 Top

Lets take all of our opinions and plaster them all over MS website. Not that it will matter but its worth a shot, a very long shot considering Microstuff's track record to date.

Reply #42 Top

Quoting Uvah, reply 41
Lets take all of our opinions and plaster them all over MS website. Not that it will matter but its worth a shot, a very long shot considering Microstuff's track record to date.
End of Uvah's quote

Or...

We can leave them be....merrily getting it wrong....and wait for Stardock perhaps to provide the SANE GUI ....and save the world...;)

Reply #43 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 42
Or...

We can leave them be....merrily getting it wrong....and wait for Stardock perhaps to provide the SANE GUI ....and save the world..
End of Jafo's quote

The thing is, we'd also need for SD to make the regular [sane] desktop the default... otherwise we're going to be switched from the SANE GUI to Metro each time an app is exited.

However, and more importantly, is is worth developing SD apps for WIN 8 when uptake on the OS is likely to be minimal to non-existent?

Reply #44 Top

Quoting starkers, reply 43
However, and more importantly, is is worth developing SD apps for WIN 8 when uptake on the OS is likely to be minimal to non-existent?
End of starkers's quote

Dunno.....history is 'full' of crappy MS OS's being foisted on the unsuspecting public.... ME .... Vista ..... 8 ...;)

Reply #45 Top

Yup and watch how many will jump on the new OS. All those not paying attention to the articles and comments etc. etc.

Reply #46 Top

Hi Everyone,

My understanding is that the Metro interface in Windows 8 is optional.  Sure hope so!  I like the tiles on my Windows 7 phone (Samsung Focus) but not on my PC desktop and I have no intention of cleaning fingerprints off my screen every day.  I recently purchased a Dell XPS 8300 (64 bit) which comes with the Dell Stage.  It has a distinctly Metro look to it and was immediatedly disabled. 

Everything on my computers is controlled via a programmable keyboard and the auto-hide quick launch bar which is available on Windows 7 if you know how to set it up.  How to Geek has a great article with the instructions if anyone is interested.  My desktop has no visible icons.  Everything works with the click of a button or the occasional click of a mouse.   Now we are going to have a "charm bar?" 

I work in a government setting where security is important but even if I have not logged off, no one can figure out how to do anything - even the IT guys.   :| They love it once I show them though.  If people I don't know ask me how I "do things" I just tell them it's magic.   My visible desktop serves primarily to display the beautiful artwork I find here and people stop in all the time to see what's on my screen that day.  Then they want to know where I find such cool stuff so I tell them about Stardock and Wincustomize all the time.  If only they would let me install Window Blinds at work!  A quick click on my keyboard displays the desktop icons when needed.

I've been "out there" since 1964 (not even DOS back then and no monitor either) and I have used every version of Windows including ME (Misery Everlasting).  I still use DOS commands on occasion too.  I am cautiously watching the development of Windows 8 and will install it on my old computer this coming week.  It will be hard to let go of Windows 7 which has been a rock solid OS right from the start.  It is the only Windows OS I have ever purchased before it was released.  I may have to think a bit about Windows 8 though. 

Thank you, Frogboy, for the Start button and menu!  Wasn't sure what I was going to do without them.  You guys totally rock! 

Reply #47 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 42
Or...

We can leave them be....merrily getting it wrong....and wait for Stardock perhaps to provide the SANE GUI ....and save the world...
End of Jafo's quote

Well, maybe it is time to split windows OS in a OS and a GUI ( desktop )... somehow like with Linux, where linux is in fact the OS ( kernel ) and KDE, Gnome, Xfce, etc are various desktop...

Microsoft returning to what they are not so bad ( OS ) and people like Stardock making their own desktop... having multiple business making various desktop will allow people to choose what they like...

Reply #48 Top

So my father calls me yesterday and asks how close Stardock can make a Windows XP desktop on Windows 7 and Vista.  His wife learned how to use a computer on XP and has a hard time understanding what to do on anything else.

They wanted to know how to put "My Computer" on the desktop and search for something without using the startmenu search.

Change is hard.  I get that.  At some point though moving forward is a good thing . . as long as what you are moving towards makes sense to the user so they can still accomplish their goals.

Reply #49 Top

Quoting Jafo, reply 44

Quoting starkers, reply 43However, and more importantly, is is worth developing SD apps for WIN 8 when uptake on the OS is likely to be minimal to non-existent?

Dunno.....history is 'full' of crappy MS OS's being foisted on the unsuspecting public.... ME .... Vista ..... 8 ...
End of Jafo's quote

Yeah, but 8 will fail to a greater extent than ME or Vista... and I don't know that I want to spend money to develop apps for a doomed OS that's not going to sell too well.

Reply #50 Top

Quoting Thoumsin, reply 47
Well, maybe it is time to split windows OS in a OS and a GUI ( desktop )... somehow like with Linux, where linux is in fact the OS ( kernel ) and KDE, Gnome, Xfce, etc are various desktop...
End of Thoumsin's quote

Windows has always been like that.... explorer.exe is the GUI [shell].  Just kill it sometime and you'll have the naked Kernel.  Alternate shell users often would be running shell-less when they broke something....wasn't scary as it could [almost] always be restarted whenever...;)