You win two internets!

Seriously though, dispel in general, and then lots more things to dispel. Add them please.

LOL! 

We know what he meant, but this is the internet.

Brevity: best.  Thing.  Ever.

But seriously, concision should be considered the holy grail of writing.  In this case, the only thing that could have made this post any better is if the words  "city" and "dispel" were flipped.  I see no problem with that.

Oh yeah, I noticed this also but forgot to post it.  I had a city with a bad enchantment on it and had no way (at least that I know of) to dispell it.  Good idea.

Watch out for this guy.  He needs everything spelled out for him.

Come on, that was funny ^^ and I agree with him! I think the original post could use a little more polishing to catch my interest, I don't talk to my friends like "Hey Martin, Want Cake!!... Title says all".

I do think there should be a way to dispell enchantments, though it should be expensive, but hopefully NOT chance based, meaby spent thrice the base mana cost of the enchantment one wish dispelled.

Also it should be easier to view enchantment effects, especially on cities, atleast so you can cast a spell with the opposite effect as a sort of countermeasure, - that is another way to handle dispelling, I quite like that too, but requires me to have been too lucky with magic level up selection.

Sincerely
~ Kongdej

Dispel should probably at least cost double the attacking spell, and should probably take longer to cast. (or the same amount of turns).

That being said, Offensive spells should have some sort of mana maintenance (of at least 1 ... I think they do? do they not?) and expire if the nation runs out of mana (or if the Sov decides to undo it for any other reason).

Offensive spells should also, as nomorebeef says, take multiple turns to use.