I really do feel as though it is strange that the TLT, a tank, does more base damage than the ART, which is supposed to be more combat oriented and less defense. This issue should be addressed.

I posted this idea for the Eradica's level 6 ability in another thread, but I think it got a little lost so I'll repeat it here. 

I'm not positive this can be done, but my suggestion is to have the ability be an activated one, but only after the titan has reached a certain health threshold (say 1500). Then, similarly to what the OP said, have it cost somewhere around 200 AM, have a decent cooldown, and buff ability recharge rate, AM recharge rate, and weapon damage, and render the titan invincible for 25-30 seconds. This keeps the general spirit of the ability and justifies it being very strong, seeing as how the titan is in dire straits health-wise. 

I like the idea behind the ability, it fits with the general sacrifice theme of the rebels. In actual play though, it doesn't end up working very well. I like my idea (not just because it's mine  ) but because it somewhat keeps the spirit of the idea intact. Thoughts?

Is it possible to add an effect of Coronata's aura to something like "Aura of Air Suppression"? Like slow down the movement of strikecrafts, or increase the damage of any weapons that can shoot at strikecrafts.

I think that may be more reasonable to just only suppress the damage of ships, and it can be somewhat useful to counter the carrier kites.

Also I just thought of an interesting alternate way of buffing the level 6 ability of the Eradica.  Well perhaps hard to balance, but certainly an interesting method:

What if it remained passive(as it is now), but also passively applied a reduced version of it's effect to nearby allied frigates that are destroyed(perhaps a 3500-400km aura)- allows them to keep fighting for maybe 15 seconds after being destroyed with a damage boost damage bonus. so perhaps something like:

Unyielding Will: Whenever an allied frigate would be destroyed within 4000 KM of the Eradica, that ship becomes invulnerable for 15 seconds before being destroyed during which time the ship's weapon systems do 20/40% extra damage.  Additionally when the Eradica it's self is destroyed it likewise becomes invulnerable for 60 seconds before beign destroyed; during this period the Eradica gains + 75/150% ability cooldown rate and +500/1000% AM regeneration.

 It would be like a better controlled(since you can give focus fire commands) passive version of the discord's level 6 ability.

It would also give the ability some benefit without killing the Eradica(it lets destroyed allied frigates keep fighting as long as it's around) as well as give a perhaps more persuasive reason then Strength of the Fallen to not just ignore the eradica in favor of killing it's fleet.

Numerical estimation of it's effects:

a Destra Crusader that lives an extra 15 seconds with +20% damage with all plasma research upgrades will deal 18*1.3*1.15*15*1.2=484 extra damage.  With no weapons upgrade researches it would be 18*1.2*15=324 damage

A corvette that lives an extra 15 seconds w/ +20% damage and all weapons research upgrades will deal 7*1.3*1.2*15=163 with it's non-PD weapons.  With no weapons upgrade research it would be 7*15*1.2=126

A disciple that lives an extra 15 seconds w/ +20% damage and all weapons research upgrades will deal 8*1.3*1.2*15=187 .  With no weapons upgrade research it would be 7*15*1.2=144

An Illuminator that lives an extra 15 seconds w/ +20% damage and all weapons research upgrades will deal 9*1.3*1.2*15=162 with it's forward beam(and potentially up to half of that with each side beam).  With no weapons upgrade research it would be 9*15*1.2=210 with it's forward beam(and potentially up to half of that with each side beam)

Moreover a Halcyon carrier could improve the damage dealt by any of the above except the crusader by up to 23%.  Either way I think this could be reasonable as it would deal less damage per ship lost then the discord's level 6 ability for all ships weaker then heavy cruiser(and frankyl I think it's reasonable for a titan to deal more reactive damage on losing a heavy cruiser then the discord can deal for every little corvette destroyed).

Also I find it interesting how by contrast to the discord, this effect would make the damage the opponent suffers for destroying your ships be higher for bigger ships destroyed.  Destroying a heavy cruiser produces more then 3x the extra damage of having a lowly corvette blown up.  

Well I'm sure my numbers aren't perfect, but I think the idea is workable and could be far more interesting, useful, and game changing then the current effect alone.  Please view this idea merely as proof of concept.

The part related to allied frigates could justa s easily be made into an active, and the ability would have a ton of knobs to adjust for balancing(aura size, invuln duration,or revive damage boost; heck it could even have a % chance of preserving allies for 15 seconds rather then being guaranteed).

Anyway, even if likely a bit too complicated, the idea popped into my head so I thought I may as put it here and see what other think(if for no other reason besides it's interesting).

That could certainly be interesting.  My only concern is that Strength of the Fallen already fails to be a sufficient reason for the opponent to focus the Eradica rather then it's attendent fleet.  Adding a new level 6 ability like that would pretty much mean Eradica would never be focused until it's fleet is dead, which utterly wastes the benefit of purification(which I think is supposed to be a core part of what the eradica is supposed to be).

I totally agree with you. I think eradica's ultimate is not appropriate because players will do everything to keep their Titan alive. And yes, Subjugation of the coronata is easily stoppable.

hmm interesting, I was unaware the Eradica has multiple attack targets per bank.  I had thought it simply had some of it's damage on side banks that couldn't attack enemies directly in front of it.  If that's the case that certainly makes a sinificant difference.

How exactly were you able to run your DPS calculations(which is to say where were you able to find exactly how much if it's DPS can target 2 enemies & such?)  Are all of it's beam banks just 2-target?

I agree Subjugating assault needs a buff.  In particular It really needs to do something against capitalships being that now days frigates are becoming increasingly rare in end game fleet battles as people are afraid of feeding titans(again as I said in my OP I'd like tosee subjugating Assault have a chance of draining AM from the target when attacking capital ships/titans).

As for Unity mass:  I agree it's a bit lackluster(mostly when compared to the Ragnarov's Snipe, which deals almost as much damage at a much longer range on a much shorter cooldown with no fleet requirement).  That said I'd rather see utility added to unity mass then have it's damage buffed.  After all, the Coronata is supposed to be a support titan.  Perhaps something like some sort of buff for all of the units who took part in the unity mass for 20 seconds.  Or alternatively maybe restore shields to units that take part.

 This could be a good opportunity to give the Advent loyalists some counter to the TEC loyalist titan's Disruptive Matrix+Marza Missile barrage combo, by giving the one ship in the advent's fleet that can still cast spells some sort of defensive buff it can apply to it's fleet to absorb some of the massive AoE damage. Alternatively giving the Coronata an interrupt would amount to the same result.

As for coronata's raw damage output: I like the idea of giving it more targets per bank, as that synergizes with subjugating assault and could potentially improve it's anti-air a bit if ti's flak got additional targets too(which IMO is one of it's weaknesses as bombers are the only major threat suppression aura doesn't reduce the damage of).

Thanks, that's extremely informative.  I was previously completely unaware that there were suc dintinct differences in the number of targets each titans weapons could be brought to bear upon.  That certainly explains why the eradica has lower DPS per target(the only stat we see in the infocard).

Perhaps I'll revise my OP at some point today.  Actually that's probably a good idea in general, my thoughts on a few topics in general have changed  a bit in the 1.5 weeks since I wrote the OP.