No, true liberals seek out causality and correct it with little regard to "traditional" outlooks.
Neo-cons have a perverted outlook that is, in effect, a terrible form of what communism leads to. *corporate welfare and economic cronyism, rigid authoritarianism, leadership Darwinism*
True conservatives just have outmoded outlooks that do not jive with scientific progress. eg: Once baby boomers are gone, social progress can continue to evolve.
if you see heritage.org the KKK is not far behind the curtain. (Imagine a neo-nazi's PR... "I used to be a jew until I found out jews are evil and hate america, like everyone else who is not christian"... when the reality is "I am a hateful and intolerant fascist trying to force my "way" onto everyone. Also I'm not smart enough to realize that if I "win" and turn American into a police state, I'll still have some new outlook to spew bile about, continuing the same irrational behavior)
Pretty much what you see in Saudi Arabia is what you'll see if neo-cons run the place, except replace religion type.
Neo-cons have a perverted outlook that is, in effect, a terrible form of what communism leads to. *corporate welfare and economic cronyism, rigid authoritarianism, leadership Darwinism*
Lord-Orion, "corporate welfare and economic cronyism, rigid authoritarianism, leadership Darwinism" is created from planned economics not free market economics. You're confusing fascism with either communism or capitalism. Communism is also planned economics. If you want to know more I suggest reading (award winning economist) Milton Freeman's book The Road to Serfdom. Go make a trip over to the library when you have time. I highly recommend it.
True conservatives just have outmoded outlooks that do not jive with scientific progress. eg: Once baby boomers are gone, social progress can continue to evolve.
Interesting. What exactly is this social progressing into? Progress has been buzzed up into an almost useless word because too many liberals don't consciously know what the end itself is. They are progressing forward, blind, they just don't know what it is exactly.
The video above explained the end goal, namely a nihilistic vision of nothing by tearing down all standards. Pure science requires ethics too. Because without them, you end with cases like the climategate scandal where data is cleverly altered to fit the special interest. They call that the end justifies the means. That is just one of the consequences.
"I used to be a jew until I found out jews are evil and hate america, like everyone else who is not christian"
I don't know where this is coming from. He is a self identified Jew (with a capital J) regardless of his disillusioned American political views. Almost everyone gets disillusioned with American politics at some point.
Let me explain the confusion over the political spectrum.
Liberals and Neoconservatives share many close ideologues. For example, Liberals take extraordinarily strong stances on hate speech. Neoconservatives take strong stances on vocal forms of sedition. The two sides end up at the same destination namely the end of our right to free speech but they take different roads to get there. Together they do more damage than if they were alone. Neoconservatives believe in close union between the concentrated private sector and all state policy through Keynesian planned economics, that is called fascism. Liberals on the other hand believe in socialism all the way to communism, another form of planned economics. Libertarians and Conservatives believe in free market capitalism, generally speaking.
