Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

D'Oh!!

Reply #2 from Sins Forums Top

so it looks like they didn't want to protect whistle blowers, now they finally are :)

Siege of Centauri
Reply #3 from WinCustomize Forums Top

So where does that leave Snowden? Wasn't he a whistleblower.

Reply #4 from AshesoftheSingularity Forums Top

Whistle-blowing protection? That's an odd reason to encrypt websites. More likely this is a broad stroke to try to solve a narrow problem, brought on by higher-ups who don't really understand the problems they are facing but know that encryption is a popular buzzword and want something to put on their performance review next year.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top

^^ That.

Reply #6 from WinCustomize Forums Top

Quoting Daiwa, reply 5

^^ That.
End of Daiwa's quote

Or it could be just another way for government to spend taxpayer dollars :-"

 

 

Reply #7 from Elemental Forums Top

Quoting starkers, reply 6


Quoting Daiwa,
reply 5

^^ That.



Or it could be just another way for government to spend taxpayer dollars :-"

 

 

End of starkers's quote

^ ^ that