Removing a signature, and removing a signature + "patching" (aka hacking) system files are two different things. The latter voids the warranty.
Yes we know Doc, I am a Violator Of Warranties, been doing this for a long while now with zero problems. I build all my own Kit from scratch, and have used custom builds for years, i rely on NO warranties, just me and my skillset, I walk My Own Path, doing things the way i want to, and it works well for me. Themes are here to stay and so is WBs, at least i am fair when discussing both in the forum, based on years of using both sides of the customising coin. Not everyone here can say that, can they.
Why make it personal, naroon1?
The point is that altering system files, and removing permissions is far less desirable than doing so, and that is the reason Stardock's software is more desirable than the alternatives.
Better, tell MS its GUI is crap, and ask them to allow people to change it more easily.
I make nothing personal Doc. It seems to stick in your throat about my use of Themes and StartAllback. Several of Stardocks programs are absolutely Brilliant and they have in the past, been my savior. I moved over to themes as they were ready for Win11 almost as soon as it was released(WB11 Was Not), and i love learning new ways of customising.
I do not have to tell or ask MS about their making there GUI easier to customise or make it easier to change, the reason for this is simple, I Change It Myself using software and my own Skillset, i can now create my own Themes, and completely change any Theme i already have, that is what i am about right now.
"Better, tell MS its GUI is crap"
Absolutely No Need Doc. They can do whatever they like with the GUI, i will just be proactive, get off my backside and do something about what they drop in my lap, and that is going very well for me. You often criticise MS for making it harder to change the GUI, what did they say to you when you complained after contacting them.