The reason that Nixon did not protest the results is because his complicity would be brought to the front as well as the other side. The reason Republicans can win elections is that in most states the number of voters for any party is under 40% and the independents make the difference. Nationally the average is that close to 90 %
I agree! We definetly need some new candidates, when they lose to George W. Bush you know we have a problem! Or write off those extreme extremists who are not even Democrat in real life, like Michael Moore, a complete socialist if not a communist. I think Democrats in the hill might have hurt themselve
Are you just talking about personal marginal rate? Or are you including business taxes? What about other costs of doing business, e.g., employee medical, pension, etc.? In terms of competitiveness, the US isn't even ranked #1 anymore (Link). O
Maybe there was something you didn't see in the post or the second post I made. IT WAS A JOKE. However, I must adress your saying Democrats just call southerners stupid. You, sir, are looking at the extremists that I notice are a majority here. Real Democrats do not call southerners stu
". If animal has no ability to comprehend union, then there would never be something like a "lion pack" or a "wolf pack". " It's communism not love. They stick together to keep each other alive. Then again it's been impossible for an animal to communicate human ideas in a way we can understand Oh
A dog can not consent or show feelings. No animal has shown the ability to comprehend the union and therefore it isn't between the individual and a partner but a partner and an object. Incest is possible to be considered a marriage. It consist
NJforever, Seriously, democrat will have a very hard time winning 2008 if they don't understand how they lost 2004. You see, it is more than just George Bush. It is more than presidency. Democrats have lost Senate, House, Governorship... and yet most of the Democrats do not do any soul searching. They simply said Bush stole the election -- just look a
Mich21, Good points. Everytime I talk to someone who support gay marraige, they have problem with polygomy (marry to more than one person). Why can't people marry to multiple partners? Who are you to judge? I n fact, throughout our human history, marriage was not just defined between a man and a woman. For majority of the human history, a man marrying to multiple women (polygomy) has always been accepted as normal. So there is historical
Wishful thinking
Economically -- the USA is just as open and protectionist as the EU (and often, as rivals, in the same areas) Culturally -- insisting on harmonizing intellectual property regimes regardless of local concerns ceraintly buys you no friends at
First of, you need to understand I am a republican. Second, to be frank, the answer to your question is: No.
The argument for gay marriage will rest, simplicty will be restored, people won't have to worry about govenrment's destruction of their religous term ( since they can just refuse to beleive certain people (gays or other people who according to
I can't seem to find the source now. I believe it was 1960 Nixon got more blacks and women votes.
Well it depends. The government will do whatever it want depending on majority opinion and representation. Though this could all be avoided if the government decided to remove the whole term of marriage from their laws and left the word to it's predominatly religous connotation and exch
Well, back than they are not called deep south republican states, back than they are deep south democrat states. Since civil war to Reagan, the south is heavily democrat. It was not until Reagan that the entire voting pattern changed forever. The so called Reagan alignment. In his alignment, the south has converted to republican, but he made the republican lost the north. Interesting huh? Do you also know blacks used to vote for republican as lat
I think if Edwards has more experience, like being a governor. He will have a good chance. Actually, I forgot one person. Bill Richardson from New Mexico can be very powerful. HIs blessing and curse is that he is Hispanic and I think we will be much more ready for a black president than a hispanic. Oh yes, I think Warner can be very competitive if he is well-like by the time of 2008. He doesn't has to be
Answer: JFK (Mass.) Anyway so your'e saying that Warner Govener of Virgnia would be best. Exactly my point, that was a long time ago. And you do know the US voting pattern changed dramatically after Reagan? The south used to vote for Democrats and the nort
DPS, You are missing the point completely. How many times do you have to miss read people. Calm down and read my writing carefully. I am not against using the term marriage for gay couple. However, I am against government using a term which is not agreed by majority of the people. If a great majority of the people want to call gay marriage is a marra
China is emerging as a power, but don't forget unlike Russia. China has enomous economic tide with USA. We are their number one trade partner. In short, they are growing because of us. One could even say US is feeding China now. China will never be quite like USSR.
Good stuff Dr. Miler. By the way, I think hpelgrift is a little kid because he doesn't seem to know history very well. So don't take it too seriously. .
Good stuff Dr. Miler
You are leaving because A) your argument doesn't hold up in big picture. B) You lost
There are 1.5 million muslims in the world, also we never insulted the Indians... http://islam.about.com/library/weekly/aa120298.htm where did you get that 1.5 from? Everywhere I read is 1.1. Anywhere, you think we didn't insult Indians? Really? Do you know India actually sided with Russia
You need to look at what the people of those country think, not their governements... Why? I am sure we anger many more Russian and Chinese people during the cold war. The Muslium in the world is less than that of Chinese or India. And I can tell you for fact that Chinese and India are alot more unit
You need to look at what the people of those country think, not their governements... Why? I am sure we anger many more Russian and Chinese people during the cold war. The Muslium in the world is less than that of Chinese or Indians. And I can tell you fo
JoeUser Forums