danielost

banned for carring on a normal conversation in a ban game.

banned for thinking nuts are healthy

[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="368" id="2945258"]Quoting danielost, reply 367*snipped for length* Non-canon source, REJECTED. Provide canonical data that Starfleet is not the military force of the Federation.[/quote] since you wont accept it anyways, i will not even try.

First and foremost was the formation of a centralized Federation Council . Employing a full Presidential system, this body would be the diplomatic, organising and presiding governing body in control of Federation affairs. The Council's Headquarters location was voted as being San Francisco , which had for a c

banned for thinking you have to be obese to like candy

banned for large word usage.

banned for now i am in love. draak is banned for getting in my way.

whiskey, the star destroyers cant destroy a planet's surface, remember they had to send in ground troops to take out the rebels shield before they could even hurt their base.

banned for being anti multi banning banned for being anti multi banning banned for being anti multi banning banned for being anti multi banning

banned now i am hungry.

[quote who="Sinperium" reply="362" id="2945198"]If the devices always elicit argument, then you'll have a hard time making a balanced mod. At present my impression is: the Empire is a legendary collosus before whom all other powers fail. The Federation may have some defensive stamina but it doomed to lose. The Stargate elements will be hoplessly outclassed by both of the above. So what will balance the technologies here? [/quote]

banned for thinking i could drop a name like lincoln.

true, and at least in star trek, a starfleet cruiser could take on three klingon cruisers.

banned for being impressed by a dead president. oh wait never mind.

banned for not multi banning when given a chance.

the federation military is just that the federation military. the federation military is not bound by the prime directive. the marines that archer takes on board when he goes to stop the weapon was military not starfleet, they stated so. by the way i am a trekkie. the federation military ships are slower but more powerful ie they give up so warp speed to be able to kill you now. &nb

[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="354" id="2945062"]1. Phasers are fairly well known to be some kind of chain-reaction weapon. It's actually pretty well known within the confines of Trek continuity, as well. Thus, phasers being used to adjust plate tectonics is unusable, especially considering I'm not sure modern science is capable of describing how you might adjust tectonic plates and the energies required.[/quote] the phaser is a laser that is run through a dilit

[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="354" id="2945062"]Enterprise-class: never existed. What you're thinking of is either the NX-class (Enterprise NX-01) or the Constitution-class, of which the Enterprise-Nil, -A, and -B were part of. But they were intended to be multiple-role craft; whilst used primarily for exploration, they were fully fitted for combative operations against contemporary opponents.[/quote] the enterprise started out as a constitution class starship.&nbs

banned for ending life with sex

banned for calling human love garbage.

[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="2" id="2914432"]quoting postIs it possible to merge some of the Mods together to create star wars vs star trek? Use the federation from SOA and add them to the Requiem mod? There was a mod that did this for Empire at War FOC. For Sins this would be awesome, to see the Feds against the Empire. A true Sci-fi nerds wet dream. Btw I know nothing about Modding and what it would take to do this. Regards Theo Okay, I see, well, a whole boatload of problems

banned for talking about a fake person like it is a real person.

banned for not knowing when they do that here in the usa, the minks dont last long because they get run over.

banned for ryating out man.

[quote who="GW Swicord" reply="32589" id="2944702"]Quoting Draakjacht, reply 32586... and history was my minor. I better damn well understand something of it. Banned 'for me too.' I was trying to remain properly playful, and have always considered my poli sci/gummint degrees to be more or less the signs of my failures as an attempted historian. The one thing I know for sure is that we know barely more than nothing about the civs that occupied the Americas before