I think everyone agrees that it is broken right now problem is how to fix it without breaking the back of the player who0's titan was destroyed.

The ideas I like and or my own (havent read them all to be hoenst)

1) a cost/time increase every time you have to rebuild your titan. The more its destroyed the longer it takes to rebuild and the more it costs.

2) Level it is rebuilt with is half what it had been. Level 2 would come out as 1. 5 as 3 (I'm rounding up) and 10 as 5. So the higher the level titan destoryed the more the penalty is

A combination of those 2 would be my ideal choice I think, a Titan just going back to 1 every time would be catastrophic, especially when you are fighting with level 10s. You would never recover against the player who still has their level 10.

This horse has been beat six feet under and still going, it is pointless. I don't understand what the fuss is about if you lose your titan it doesn't matter whether the levels transfer or not, you have lost the game either that or the other player doesn't know how to capitalize on their winnings.

I'd be curious why that would be a problem?

If at all, it'd indicate Titans are too cheap and too weak. I mean it's a Titan. You pool a gargantuan amount of resources into a ship which is stronger than multiple caps combined. But if you lose it... then well, yes, you screwed up. It's like losing the Death Star, you don't simply rebuild it.

Simple solution:

New Titans start at level 1, but players are allowed to buy back levels for level they've gained, at the same rate capital ship levels can be bought.

For example: you level your Titan to level 6. It's killed.

You build a new Titan and purchase level 2 for 1,250 credits, level 3 for 1500, etc, all the way up to level 6.

Think of it as advanced crew training, but each level you unlock unlocks a new level of crew training. You might have to modulate costs.

Let's go over this again shall we? If the titan doesn't retain any level, the player who lost it has no incentive to play (other than feeding in team games) and adding in loss of an arbitrary amount of levels gets extremely complicated and screws over the already terrible ult of the advent (rebel?) titan. The time it takes to rebuild a titan should give the person who killed it enough time to farm up their titan/cap ships and break the defenses. It allows snowballing while not making the game about who lost their titan first. 

There really needs to be filter that just automatically deletes new threads with "titan" and "level" in their name. 

Roguelike games do that all the time; makes death a big risk.

I don't play SOASE much at all (And at the time, I know next to nothing about Rebellion), but what's the logic of a Titan regaining its lost levels? Didn't most of its trained, experienced crew get blown up with the destroyed ship?

I posted a comment on a similar post some days ago:

I feel is that they should keep the cost of making a Titan relative to their level/experience when being made. Not only would it justify the retention of the level/experience by Titans, but it would also make you protective of your high level titan. Not too much cost variance, but still should be there.

For instance, in one game I was playing, I was on the verge of destroying an Advent rebel empire. They only had like 3 planets/asteroids left. I destroyed their level 6 Eradica (it took down a lot of my ships before it died, damn invulnerable power  ). But then their allies attacked me with a huge fleet, so I had to retreat. I built up my fleet again, BUT by then they had built another level 6 Eradica. With their 3 colonies, their economy should have died. But here I saw another poewrful   Eradica, who again took down ships (less this time, had made more carriers and bombers). Their allies weren't helping my cause either.

I'm not saying cost scaling is absolutely necessary, but just an idea. It justifies retention of level and XP. Cost scaling would be a disadvantage on 1vs1 games, but helpful on larger maps with allies. So, it could made a Game Option you select before starting the game.

There is no logic, it really is completely non-sensical...that being said:

These are my feelings as well...even if it seems really out of place or illogical, I still think it's for the best...

I'm not against "consequences" for losing a Titan, such as increased cost, but I am strongly against Titans losing their levels or "consequences" that make it take too long to reacquire your titan....

To be fair, I hate the leveling system on titans at all. I mean, was it a cheap easy solution to make the titan scale into late game. yes.

What would have been better in my opinion is instead of doing levels with up grades, you do levels with side grades.

Let me clarify what I mean by side grade:

Instead of getting a hull boost and shield regen boost, you have options. Depending on what you pick will negitively impact other facets of your titan.

Ragnarov for example, if you pick snipe as an upgrade, some of the structural supports need to be removed in the hull to make room for the gun, -500 hp or armour reduction -1.7 BUT you get a massive snipe ability. This way after you build your titan it's that strong overall for it's life span in the game. maybe give it a little buff out of the gate to help in late game.

I'm tired, but hopefully you can see the point I was trying to make.

I know there are allot of titan level related posts and i dont keep track of them all buy has yarlin or any of the devs commented yet ?

Will they make any titan changes ?