TheGreatEmperor TheGreatEmperor

The Topic Thread

▼

The Topic Thread

a place of discussion

from Sins Forums
K, now I dont know how big of crowd this will bring in, maybe in the end it will be just me and Schem argueing.

B
u
t

I have decided that in the recent lack of random discussion threads(that dont concern Sins) it became my responsibility as a member of the Sentient Objects Committee for the Spreading of Intelligence Thoughts and Other Random Mental Occurances to start one(yes I know it is a run-on sentance).

So heres the basic outline. Someone picks a topic to discuss(anything as long as it has some semblacne of intelligent output). Topic is discussed, then someone picks another topic, topic is discussed. The cycle continues and if no one decides to be a chauvanist, troll, imbecile, or just plain annoying then everyone is happy and hopefully more intelligent.

So may we begin with the topic of...
off-topic
165,351 views 89 replies
Reply #76 from Sins Forums Top

like, oh my god! are you who I think you are?

The one the only... the great and powerful Karmashock.
Reply #77 from Sins Forums Top
wait, you're the one who said nobody could sieze up the crash legally, you turncoat.


No, I said that the president had no such power, Congress did, but they would go into debate about it first hand and if the current trend of division between the parties continues then the arguements would end up inconclusive.

I didnt say it wasnt, look at the New Deal, before that people would never have consented to the outrageous taxes we have to pay and the corrupt unwieldy monstrosity of a government it supports, but thats what happens...


Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy , making the income tax necessary.

and hence your statement


FAILS!


Or it doesnt, I agree with him, a word can have multiple meaning, it matters what context it is placed in and by who.

I.E. Such as in your case when you say you are intelligent you actually mean "Hey peeps, I am jack ass please make fun of me".
The one the only... the great and powerful Karmashock.


Never heard of you



Multiplicity - Control multiple PCs using one keyboard and mouse
Reply #78 from Sins Forums Top
Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy , making the income tax necessary

are you deaf as well as dumb (and blind)? we aren't talking about bureaucracy, we're talking about what happens in times of crisis. thats why I summoned the amazing historical power of the new deal.
No, I said that the president had no such power, Congress did, but they would go into debate about it first hand and if the current trend of division between the parties continues then the arguements would end up inconclusive.

its a siezure, congress doesnt debate about it.
Or it doesnt, I agree with him, a word can have multiple meaning, it matters what context it is placed in and by who.

I.E. Such as in your case when you say you are intelligent you actually mean "Hey peeps, I am jack ass please make fun of me".

and when you say "jack ass" you mean "oh greatest man I've ever been a forumy to."
Never heard of you

before your time, young laddy.
Reply #79 from Sins Forums Top
are you deaf as well as dumb (and blind)? we aren't talking about bureaucracy, we're talking about what happens in times of crisis. thats why I summoned the amazing historical power of the new deal.


Is that an attack on deaf, blind and dumb people. Oh boy, you are a Republican.

its a siezure, congress doesnt debate about it.


Everything deserves debate.

and when you say "jack ass" you mean "oh greatest man I've ever been a forumy to."


Exactly, your starting to see my point of view. Well the greatest man part is a piece of your own exaggeration.

before your time, young laddy.


Yes, still doesnt change anything.
Reply #80 from Sins Forums Top
Is that an attack on deaf, blind and dumb people. Oh boy, you are a Republican.

never heard the song... another thing before your time.
Everything deserves debate.

thats being naive.
Exactly, your starting to see my point of view. Well the greatest man part is a piece of your own exaggeration.

and your claim of my exaggeration is an exaggeration of yours!
Yes, still doesnt change anything.

he was your predecessor's predecessor.
Reply #81 from Sins Forums Top

thats being naive.


No, just imprecise. "Everything significant deserves debate"... if there's time.
Reply #82 from Sins Forums Top
thats not naive, thank you ron.
Reply #83 from Sins Forums Top

thats not naive, thank you ron.


That said, significance is in the eye of the beholder. And the question of whether or not a given subject is in itself a question of significance... is a question of significance.
Reply #84 from Sins Forums Top
Everything that happens, while in happening causes itself to happen, happens again, it doesnt do it in order though.

I stand by my earlier statement though, everything deserves debate.
Reply #85 from Sins Forums Top

Never heard of you

That's like saying you've never heard of George Washington or SunTzu... your ignorance of my glory does nothing to diminish it.

Reply #86 from Sins Forums Top

thats not naive, thank you ron.


That said, significance is in the eye of the beholder. And the question of whether or not a given subject is in itself a question of significance... is a question of significance.

its not the significance that is of significance, its the "if theres time" that is significantly of significance.
Reply #87 from Sins Forums Top
its not the significance that is of significance, its the "if theres time" that is significantly of significance.


Ah, but the significance of the significance is by far the greater of the two significances, its just that the significance of any time limits outweights it as a matter of practicality!

./breaks down into giggles at your sentence structure
Reply #88 from Sins Forums Top
Ah, but the significance of the significance is by far the greater of the two significances, its just that the significance of any time limits outweights it as a matter of practicality!

significance is of no significance when faced with a significant constraint on time! so of the two significant statements, the significance of "significance" is by far less significant.
./breaks down into giggles at your sentence structure

oh stuff it.
Reply #89 from Sins Forums Top
That's like saying you've never heard of George Washington or SunTzu... your ignorance of my glory does nothing to diminish it.


Well I ran a search on you, oh glorious one. Now unless the name Karmashock is quite common on the internet you dont seem to really impress.

significance is of no significance when faced with a significant constraint on time! so of the two significant statements, the significance of "significance" is by far less significant.


Yes, but the significance of choice outweights eather time or proper signficance. Now I said deserves debate, whether it is deemed to be debated is well a decision to still be made.

oh stuff it.


I actually find it quite refreshing, do continue.