That's pretty non sequitur.
I beg to differ.
I was just emphasizing the fact there IS no tactics to realistically catch the Carriers that chill out at the edge of the grav well.
The correct plural is "ARE no tactics," not "IS no tactics." At any rate, I don't necessarily agree with you, but perhaps you shouldn't be trying to catch them anyway - at least not in the way that you are trying to do it. Perhaps that's one of your (many) problems.
If you chase them they'll jump away to the next system deeper and deeper into their territory while in every single grav well his fighters/bombers smack you a new one.
Again, perhaps you shouldn't be "playing their game" and moronically chasing them through system after system with slower ships. Funny, in the story I told above, I learned after my first encounter with these tactics, and corrected my behavior, and changed my tactics. You never did. What does that say about you?
Clearly everyone can see this problem, only you can't.
I've seen this from you in several other threads. You claim that everyone agrees with you, and whoever disagrees is the guy that can't see the problem. You usually follow this up with an attack of being a "carrier spam buddy" or whatever term you use. Let's just say that I really don't care how many people agree with me or don't (it's irrelevant), but having said that I think most of the agreement you think you have is in your mind.
The irony is, by trying to depict me as an unsophisticated player and by defending Carrier/Strike Craft spam you destroy tactics itself.
Funny, I never depicted you as an unsophisticated player (although you may be). Neither did I defend any sort of spam (but neither did I attack it). What I said was that what you are really doing is arguing for removal of tactics from the game. Every time you scream about a carrier sitting at the edge of the well that you can't catch, and every time you say that carrier range should be nerfed, you are arguing for removal of tactics from the game.
If you didn't speak of carriers at the edge of a well, or carriers running away, then I wouldn't accuse you of wanting to remove tactics from the game. If you simply left it as a discussion on what the attack and defense values should be on flak frigs, strikecraft, etc. then that would be fine. Then we'd all be arguing over the correct numbers for attack, armor, etc. But instead, you always choose to bitch about a tactic. That's your problem. It's a common sense, no-brainer tactic actually. I mean, why on earth would anyone want to sit there like a dumb rock with a ship designed to combat other ships at range, and duke it out with a slower more powerful ship when he could keep his distance and keep dealing damage? That's just a no brainer. And yes, IT IS A TACTIC.
Btw, I'm nationally ranked in Chess and Fencing (which is described as Physical Chess) I'll take you on anytime anywhere.
I have no fear of a guy who confuses singulars and plurals, and who doesn't know what a tactic is. I'll play you in chess anytime, anywhere.