Evan James

Evan James

Joined Member # 2961372
6 Posts 7 Replies 125 Reputation

Downloaded the beta and decided to give it a spin with pen and notepad by my side. Here's the list of issues I found: The splash screen starting the game doesn't have a progress bar; I wasn't sure if it had hung right there The "skip intro cutscene" box in the options can't be checked There are 3 different controls for music volume in the options list, which is pretty confusing. I can't tell which is which. The "SFX" volume bar makes

0 Replies 3,967 Views

A short list of bugs and issues from beta 2.5... - The Vasari starbase's phase stabilizer ability now costs antimatter. But adding the module doesn't raise the starbase's max antimatter, so it's impossible to use the stabilizer unless you also research and build one of the other ability modules. - Starbases aren't targeted by the effects of planetary bodies. i.e. they don't get antimatter regen from stars, or a hit penalty in asteroid bel

5 Replies 3,246 Views

The thing is, starbases get linear benefits from research, while mobile ships get exponentially better. A late game fleet with all upgrades doesn't just have 20% better damage and 30% better defense, it is also much, much bigger, because of additional fleet supply. In the "attacking fleet vs. defending starbase" matchup, both sides benefit the same amount from weapon and defense upgrades, but the fleet can become several times more powerful by researching fleet supply and building

8 Replies 30,618 Views

Not being able to upgrade a starbase to do everything is apparently a deliberate decision by Ironclad, so that you have to really choose whether you want military protection, economic bonuses, or whatever, rather than being able to get all the other upgrades too once you have enough money to buy everything. The main problem in the current beta version is that a lot of the upgrades just aren't very good, so it's easy to add something to the starbase and end up regretting it. So

8 Replies 30,618 Views

It's still only one starbase per grav well *per player*, so in, say, a 4v4 game you could have 8 starbases in the same gravity well (unlikely, but entertaining). Besides that, lots of things I already agree with. :) I would add: I wish that there was a mineclearing ability for scouts - instead of a "vulnerability aura" passive skill, an autocastable "safely disarm 1 targeted mine" ability - and that scouts would smartly use that ability if included in a fleet. Pi

29 Replies 168,066 Views

Opinions and glitches from the starbase's special abilities and non-military upgrades... Advent: - The Advent starbase's meteorite-hurling special abilities don't work at all. The graphics play but nothing happens. - Also, the meteorites are graphically way oversized. It looks like this is a bug that also affects TEC's Kol battleship's cannon ability - the projectile is huge now. - The "confusion" ability for Advent bases is a grea

2 Replies 2,121 Views

I hereby invent a new acronym: ASF, for Anti-Structure Frigate! Impressions so far with ASFs: They have fairly bad behavior when put in a fleet. For example, if a fleet is bombing an enemy planet and there's nothing left in the gravity well but extractors and logistics structures, the ASFs hang out doing nothing rather than attacking the structures. Also, ASFs should probably come out of the factory with fleet auto-joining turned on. They don't do w

9 Replies 4,540 Views

First, yes, the Kosutra's damage has been substantially increased in Entrenchment. It looks like it deals a few thousand points of damage. Orbital structures have high armor and aren't immediately incinerated, but do lose a little less than half their HP. Second, it looks like the Novalith cannon also got a change - it now debuffs a struck planet with a long-lasting effect that reduces maximum population by 40%. This is probably intended to make firing a single

12 Replies 40,403 Views

The Kosutra cannon doesn't really deal lethal damage to orbital structures - it hurts them, sure, but one shot usually only gets 30-40% of structure hp. It's the 3 minutes of downtime that matters - or rather, the combination of heavy damage and long downtime to structures with light damage and short (15 sec) downtime to ships in that gravity well. But the real advantage is that it now also turns the target planet into a phase stabilizer node. (I think that's a c

12 Replies 40,403 Views

Observations so far on the new Defense research tree enhancements for defensive structures: - The TEC Gauss cannon upgrades are definitely worth the money and get the job done. If I saw a grav well stopped up with fully-upgraded cannons, I would want to bring the new anti-structure bombardment frigates to deal with them. You can wipe out upgraded defenses with a straightforward attack, but your lost frigates are more expensive than their lost cannons. -

2 Replies 2,080 Views

Some are bugs, some are just annoying: - The research screen says that laser weapon upgrades will improve Advent hangar defenses. But Advent hangar defenses are unarmed. - The description of the Advent hangar defense ability says that it "bolsters" shields, which feels like a misleading wording to me. The ability restores shields, while "bolster" suggests it adds to maximum shields or something. - Also, the shield-restoring ability of the hangar

3 Replies 2,160 Views

First thoughts from Entrenchment gaming: The starbase upgrade paths for the TEC are drastically out of whack in power. The bonus armor/hull upgrade adds as much HP as the original starbase itself - you get a starbase with an extra starbase strapped to it, essentially. Then you get two more with the third and fourth upgrades. On the other hand, the modules for trading, ship construction, and strike craft squads are really weak, since if you wanted tho

0 Replies 1,542 Views

I find that the Arceans always do badly in expansion and never make a comeback. The early colony rush takes speed. Terrans or Altarians with +1 ship speed can reach planets twice as fast as Arceans. Suppose a planet is 48 units away. +1 ships get there in 12 turns; +0 ships in 16; -1 in 24. Not only do the Arceans successfully colonize fewer worlds, their worlds are less developed because they've been colonized for less time - that example world has an extra 12

12 Replies 36,896 Views

1. Fix the broken improvements... yep, that's another 2c for the Mind Control Center. =) I would also include the planetary defense improvements - some of them claim to give a bonus but don't actually show the little "defense +x%" icon in planet menus, and defense bonuses don't show up on the details screen for that planet. I can't tell from advantage numbers whether these improvements actually work. 2. Espionage overhaul (part I) - I understand this is already in the works in some

274 Replies 737,351 Views