I just found that the amount of resources i thought it would use to be a little off. The game is fully playable at high settings for Company of Heroes, but putting on directX10 makes it so i cant even play at all pretty much, and to be honest the increase in graphics doesnt seem like it would be worth it.
Actually i had this issue on my nvidia 8800 GTS, but a restart of the game fixed it.
Woah woah woah, i see alot of people saying CPU's will always need to be rediculously fast, but think about this for a second...... You've seen all those random linux boxes running with very little hardware but puttering on serving webpages forever right? thats not very CPU intensive, not many calculations needed, just simple file transfer really..... [link="http://Coding Horror Article"]WWW Link[/link] "I expect the relationship between CPU and GPU to largely be a sym
I don't like it. There are some that are in love with the thing but..... i can't stand how much resources it uses. ^^^^^ after reading that comment most people tell me to stop using a pentium 3, but i have a pretty good gaming rig, i can run crysis at high settings...but vista still seems slow to me sometimes. [link="http://news.cnet.com/Windows-XP-outshines-Vista-in-benchmarking-test/2100-1016_3-6220201.html"]WWW Link[/link] SP3 of XP beats Vista in most perfo
Yes but not for the reasons your thinking. If your looking for a huge performance boost out of using x64, then you are probably not going to find it, aside from it being able to use 4gigs of ram, as opposed to however much it is using right now. x64 bit operating systems are not "faster" than 32 bit operating systems until you start using all of those 64 bits. wait whut? yeah alot of people get confused by this, myself included before i checked it out. Using large numbers 64 bi
