As I said we don't need to argue about ranking so I don't see the point of you throwing you're apparent greatness in RTS games around? I meant it as a jest bud =) The option would be nice, and again fix the late game problems.
We've got a scrub! But seriously, I agree with the option. Thats why SupComs multiplayer is superb ( not the program itself just to be clear ) but it gives you the option to play ranked or custom. We could argue for hours about how ranking makes/breaks online RTS games, but it wouldn't get us anywhere.The bottom line is that ICO needs to implement ranking and other features for those who enjoy it and to help keep people involved with it, fix the firewall issue, and balance late game tactics.
Make the end of the game official to whom? And even though the devs say "it's a slow game;'real time' strategy" doesn't excuse poor game mechanics and little to no incentive for playing the game. At this point I'll do a fun game a week and use it at LAN's, no more, unless some form of ranking and tracking system comes later. They need to get this stuff fixed and implemented, alot of the multiplayer gripes I have could have easily been implemented before launch. SupCom is popular for a reason, no
The thing is, there is no way to see how many games someone has won right? There is no ranking system right? No top leaderboard? So whats the point of staying and wiping someone completely out? You know you've won and you don't want to waste the time to mop him up, so just leave. It doesn't hurt anything, and if you've won you've won. That and if you're the game host you can end it manually =)
Sins Forums