ArcadiaNemetai

[quote]You can never change the attitude of a noob.Except for one thing , and I implore Ironclad to do this , because the current win/loss system is crap.Basically reward In-game time. The more hours you clock inside a game , the higher your rank . This means even if your losing , if you stay in the game you gain more rank.[/quote] Nice Idea, +1 :CONGRAT: That would help alot considering the amount of games that people DC from. alot of people have like 50 games and only like

[quote]Im glad there is not a banning feature, thats one of the most annoying things about battle.net in that sometimes you don't even know why you got banned in the first place....[/quote] Agreed, I think that IF they ever add a ban feature, it must expire with each game, NOT carry over to ANY games made by the banning player. I think that a report system could help ALOT more than an ignore or ban system though, mabey if 3 people in a room report them it bans them from that ro

As an advent player, I agree that repulsion is OP, I also would like to note that, if it blocks strike craft (I have not tested this) then there is nothing that the advent can use to hit a guard when it has repulsion active (being that the range of illums is inside the repulsion range, particularly frustrating). This IMO is a problem. While it is powerful against TEC and Vasari, they can at least hit it with their LRFs. Oh, and the z axis control was removed in 1.05

[quote]i never even knew it existed, but now i want to use it >[/quote] Same. lol

[quote]Hold on one sec, I'm going to put in wikipedia that LRM spam is a noob strategy.[/quote] rofl, nice man. It woukld make sense that anything other than missles and autocannons would count as energy.

Im glad there is not a banning feature, thats one of the most annoying things about battle.net in that sometimes you don't even know why you got banned in the first place....

Guess Im lucky that Xfire won't even let me sign on..... lol.