[quote]As for the UNSC, heres an excerpt from Halopedia. The UNSC Navy is the branch of the United Nations Space Command Defense Force responsible for naval operations in space. Its roles include ship-to-ship combat, orbital bombardment, the deployment of atmospheric and space fighters, and the delivery of UNSC Marines into combat. guess they are a navy.[/quote] its a wiki, it is not credible! just kidding, i think wikipedia is the greatest resource known
eoncommander
i'm pretty sure the other ships have names, they just arent shown. otherwise, how would the commanders identify the individual ships? and the devs were just lazy (or decided that the opportunity cost was too high) and declined to make names for hundreds of frigates and cruisers
humanity wouldnt be able to survive in the face of such terrors what if the college application process didnt exist?
NATO would win (assuming both sides were rational enough not to launch nukes. then everyone loses). though in 1989 the Cold War was basically over. the USSR was collapsing by then. thats actually a good point. i amend my answer: the world would end in nuclear holocaust because the USSR would be pushed into desparate actions (read: launching nukes). what if NATO and the USSR went to war in 1982, assuming both sides were rational enough to not launch? (oh, i do love Tom Clancy)<
i'm pretty sure there isnt a mention of ground troops for the TEC at all, which i think you were getting at, allegiance. no need to be an ass about it though. and just because it uses naval terms doesnt mean it is called a navy. think of Halo. UNSC is United Nations Space Command. no navy there. unless i suddenly lost the ability to read.
[quote who="koda0" reply="34" id="2412073"]I would become the Terminator. [/quote] i said one! i would curl up in a corner and cry. what if SoaSE didnt exist? edit: a little late there, i guess
the one fallacy in this debate is that they might come out with a full expansion next (though i doubt it)
i would take a gun and shoot it in the head for threatening our way of life. sad, i know, but a necessary sacrifice. dogs must know their place! what if you could get one cybernetic enhancement?
i swear, i think i said the same thing, kitkun and CI. but no matter. this is like arguing about god. we have no evidence. a lack of evidence more supports the negative rather than the positive. so it is more likely that the other branches dont exist. also, there was the example of the japanese in wwii, whose chips were called IJN... referring to the whole navy, not the individual ship. now why not just jump that up one level, and have it refer to the entire military?
i would agonize, but probably chose the fifty. sorry future one true love what if you had the ability to go back in time, and change one thing, and one thing only?
still here, waiting, waiting...
noticed you changed the title based on our feedback. nice btw, i'm winning! (i should win just for making that grammatical distinction)
thats really awesome, though i dont have time to read it right now
[quote who="C.I." reply="123" id="2408993"]Well network/navy is everyone's own opinion. Until blair tells us! you know that it's gonna be something from far outa left field; our guesses won't come close. [/quote] oh absolutely, we have no idea what it really stands for. but it sure is fun to debate[e digicons]:P[/e]
i had a friend who was going to write a similar story a few years back, but he scrapped it. inspired me to write, however. in three years, i have parts of six chapters written, and about 25 pages written (12000 words). testament to my work ethic, i guess. and it is scifi
[quote who="Allegiance86" reply="121" id="2408917"]more then plausible is just saying it has just as much a chance of it being the actual word as network.........wasnt saying it was MORE likely then the others. [/quote] ok. you made it sound as if it was more likely. my bad
wait what about me!!
[quote who="Allegiance86" reply="119" id="2408870"]USS might not have Navy in it but IJN as mentioned earlier does. Which proves its more then plausible that thats the meaning. [/quote] why? according to what we have, there's a 50-50 chance that navy would be in it. and i could go on with titles w/out navy. hms being the most obvious
[quote who="Emplear" reply="115" id="2407888"]Tempary or Trade Deffence Navy still in my opion seems the most logical even after all the Discussions. Because even today with our limited space travel both Asto and Cosmo nauts both refere to a space Sailer and in all fiction I've come acrossed they refere to space trave in the Naval terms. And I would Imagion that over time the space sailer idea just like in all other space Science fiction would continue as a space Navy. &
i dont particularly care about character count what is your novel about?
just letting you know we are still watching. when are we getting more? [e digicons]>:([/e] just kidding, work at your own pace, CI. we understand. kind of incidentally, how long is sinners currently? i was thinking about this the other day while i was writing my book, just in terms of the progress i was making
temporary might work, i guess. i still like trader defense network. if SINs were real, it wouldnt bbe SINs. very little of it follows any real physics, but thats for a different thread
did anyone else's forum page just go all screwy? i dont even know who made the last post. and its just this forum, i checked a bunch of others but if the SINs universe was real, the navies would be quite a bit larger too. almost unfathomably huge. in fact, most of a planet's defenses would be based in space. the space navy would be the most important branch of the military, because ti alone could connect the various planets and it alone could easily wipe out the other branches
[quote]and you cant roll them all into one force. it seems likely that planetary work would get pretty jumbled, but the marines will ALWAYS be your main assault force for planetary attack or ship to ship boarding operations. that is just their main pupose for existing. but any space faring military force is going to draw heavily from the airforce and the navy in terms of tactics, but the ships required to fill those roles will be referenced to the purpose of wet navy ships[/quote] my