[quote who="PlayerSlayer" reply="46" id="3323159"]Turtleundefeated (aka Chose from Vanilla sins) again held up a game by around 40-50 mins before I finally decided to leave. I've seen him do it on at least 2-3 other occasions. [/quote] I seriously hope players ban turtleundefeated from all games and do not join games he host.
Not on his first post.
[quote who="Nightraid3r" reply="64" id="3319782"] Quoting Cykur, reply 63 The Vorastra Maw ability can be largely countered by just splitting your carriers up into a bunch of little groups. Yeah, it is a pain in the butt, but the Vorastra has no way to counter carriers all over the place..before long it will have to flee or die since it can't outrun bomber spam. Also, the Vorastra is slow to turn and aim...even when I have jumped it right into
[quote who="psychoak" reply="8" id="3319781"]My 680 vehemently disagrees with you, it still chugs eventually no matter how low the graphics settings are. His old 2.8ghz opteron cores were less than half the power of his new ones. It may not matter that there are more of them, but the speed sure as hell does. His graphics card is major overkill for sins. I know because I had a flawed 560 SOC from gigabyte that needed to be underclocked to avoid a
It wasn't harsh but just the truth. And there is not a word of apology in his post, just complains about a failed strat and getting bored.
He doesn't sound like a troll to me, more like a ignorant person. Anyway, I LOL.
oh ya , kok kodiak rush is a failed strat unless your neighbour is a newbie.
If this is a blizzard game , balancing will be out long ago. But this is stardock we are talking about , chances of balancing the game is next to 0.
Actually gfx card is the key factor in whether the game gfx lags late game. CPU speed only helps loading time mainly unless its too low. And for games like sins , it only uses single core so dual or quad core won't matter at all.
I have played with you about 10times or more and about 80% of time , you quit within the first 20mins. I told my china friends that if you are their opponent, just kill your capital ship and you will quit. Ppl like you are what spoils others from enjoying this game online.
I have 0 gfx lag no matter how many ships is on the map with my PC. PS : Do not play late game with zil as he will lag the game till unplayable with his 286....his CPU hits 100 very easily and if there's a 100000 scale...i'm sure he will hit that too. No offense but just stating facts.
turtleundefeated , always goes afk on losing game. This is the 4th time i've seen it myself and i'll post replay if needed for proof.
Soon every race and the game will be banned
[quote who="Turchany" reply="33" id="3315370"] Quoting JustAnotherName, reply 32 Obviously you still don't get it. 95% or more players left the multiplayer scene because it takes too long to start a game. But if matchmaking was there in the first place, this problem will be minimal. Check starcraft 2 system to get a clue how a good ranking works. It is not too accurate for team vs team but then its still a decent one. Way better than sitt
[quote who="Turchany" reply="31" id="3315291"] Quoting JustAnotherName, reply 30 Which is why for sins multiplayer online to get better, they need a matchmaking system. Without matchmaking , any multiplayer game is doom to fail. Someone wrote the problem with this, you can do matchmaking but if there aren't enough players online you can make matchmaking forever to be fair, and it won't change anything if
[quote who="Zyzyfer" reply="27" id="3315147"] quoting post I want to sum up last 2 months of ICO .... ICO was almost dead most of the day and on prime time there was possibly a few over 100 of people on it. That was on very good day. Then December sale came and ICO peeps jumped to 700+ people with at least about 200 people playing sins over ICO at any given time during a day. AT the time I am writing this there is 40 people on-line. <br /
its definitely vicious or unfair AI sometimes. I dunno how it is determined though but sometimes AI is like normal.
[quote who="Turchany" reply="1" id="3313615"]There is no possibility to rejoin, in theory you can host the multiplayer save and continue from that autosave if there is any and every player have it, but it is somewhat complicated, I always consider games gone when i crash.. If you drop out you will be substituted by an AI, and it would be impossible for you to connevt again, you will need to get all current data that is not really possible I think, sync again etc.
[quote who="ARESIV" reply="15" id="3312804"] Quoting DirtySanchezz, reply 5 quoting postIs it because game is bad??? I do not think so. As difficult as it may be to accept, we might have to face the fact that the game just doesn't have much staying power for 99% or 99.5% of the people who purchase it. It may not be an ICO issue. It's possible that the game is great, but that there aren't enough gamers out t
[quote who="Turchany" reply="12" id="3312757"]JustAnotherName there isn't even anything to measure player skill, even win loss ratio means almost nothing, and played games number is not so reliable as good number in both can be achieved by playing against AI or just friends. First something should be done to measure player skills but this would be too complicated I think.. [/quote] Have you heard of the game starcraft 2? Check it before you say ranking system is im
[quote who="Turchany" reply="10" id="3312526"] Quoting Greg30007, reply 9 If so many of those 700+ were noobs yes occasionally they got lost and they walked into skilled game and got kicked from it or if they managed to play it they got creamed but there were plenty of noobs only games hosted during that time. I do not believe chasm between skilled and noobs is reason why crowds did not stay. It's so str
This is a multiplayer game and its boring playing single player. However , as we can see, ICO is horrible in terms of latency or interface or features. We are in 2013 now....and a multiplayer online game still do not have a proper match up feature...thats disappointing. If ICO is similar to battlenet...i'm very sure we have lots more players.
[quote who="Chris11" reply="1019" id="3311044"]Lol greg you crack me up man. I had him contained and down to his hw and I asked you what I needed to kill his sb. I built exactly what you called for and it didn't work lol. The fleet wasn't even expensive, it was cobalts and corvettes lol plus 10 orgovs. You said your marza was coming after that battle had happened so thats irrelevant. Also mb doesn't kill sb's lol, and by the time I had mb his sb was max upgraded. I also had hi
[quote who="Teun-A-Roonius" reply="1018" id="3311018"] Quoting Howdidudothat, reply 1017 Well me and KP aren't at your level as well so it can be said pretty fair if you consider the other 3 players tier 1 level. Yes you are not but you both are better than d angel and /forgot his name/ the guy that was playing (versus dark blue I think you) He should lock you in and finish you off when he had that 10 ogrows and missile barrage. Instead he suic
[quote who="Greg30007" reply="1014" id="3310747"] Quoting JustAnotherName, reply 1013 And furthermore , KP dropped in both games. In the 2nd game , KP dropped 5mins into the game which basically mean 4v5 in the 2nd set. Who are you? Yes Kp dropped in second game like 5 min into the game so it was 4v5 since we killed ai very soon and yet we were still struggling to beat them. In the end we were winning but that winning push ende
