I look forward to visualizing this as I play my next game.

none of the LRM's have capital armour in 1.02, is this is based on 1.03 or typo?

from frigatepsilongrange.entity

TXT
entityType "Frigate"
defaultAutoAttackRange "GravityWell"
defaultAutoAttackOn TRUE
prefersToFocusFire TRUE
autoJoinFleetDefault TRUE
canBomb FALSE
frigateRoleType "Lrm"
statCountType "FrigateLongRange"
mainViewIcon "MAINVIEWICON_FRIGATE_PSILONGRANGE"
picture "PICTURE_FRIGATE_PSILONGRANGE"
NameStringID "IDS_FRIGATE_PSILONGRANGE_NAME"
DescriptionStringID "IDS_FRIGATE_PSILONGRANGE_DESCRIPTION"
counterDescriptionStringID "IDS_COUNTERDESC_FRIGATE_LONGRANGE"
basePrice
credits 350.000000
metal 50.000000
crystal 40.000000
slotCount 6.000000
BuildTime 22.000000
hasLevels FALSE
ExperiencePointsForDestroying 45.000000
MaxHullPoints 500.000000
MaxShieldPoints 500.000000
HullPointRestoreRate 1.000000
ShieldPointRestoreRate 1.000000
BaseArmorPoints 2.000000
maxMitigation 0.6
Prerequisites
NumResearchPrerequisites 1
ResearchPrerequisite
Subject "RESEARCHSUBJECT_FRIGATEACCESS_LONGRANGEPSI"
Level 1
numRandomDebrisLarge 0
numRandomDebrisSmall 7
numSpecificDebris 0
armorType "Light"
hudIcon "HUDICON_FRIGATE_PSILONGRANGE"

thank you devs

Very cool, thank you.

It was a typo on my part as they have light armor, I just got overzealous with the copy/paste.

Fixed.

Thanks for the chart it is very helpful. However, there are a couple of combinations that I can't understand:

Why should anti-med wpns be more effective against very hvy armor (75%) than anti-hvy wpns vs very hvy armor (50%). It would make a lot more sense to me if those two were reversed.

The same holds true for anti-med wpns vs capital armor (75%) compared to anti-hvy wpns vs capital armor (50%).

Any explaination regarding this would be very helpful. Apart from this oddity the rest of the table is very intuitive (as it should be).

nope that was another misconception made by a few people (possibly one, but a few started stating it as though its true) who made a mistake.

heres a nice link and I havent found any errors with it (they directly get the info from the files, no chance of typo) and I usually double check the entity files as I've just done now to make sure the site is correct.

Link with stats for each long range ship, extracted from the files in a easy to read format

[ Squadron Support AKA carriers -> according to manual , Armor type = Medium, plz check ]

seirablack, ty for the great chart. Is there any possibility you can remake or resize the chart to make it a bit larger? I'm interested in using it as a wallpaper but i have a 1920x1200 resolution monitor. If you could double the resolution or make a wallpaper out of the chart it would be greatly appreciated. thanks.

Actually, and far more likely, its one of the things that got changed from Beta 4 -> release.

Is it just me or does this chart basically imply that the Bomber "mini-ships" are more effective in every area than the fighters?

You think they'll ever make the game more expansive, galaxy wise. They should at the very least make it where mods can be downloaded, direct from game, intstead of having you do all the work. I get confused most of the time, doing it, and have only successively done it once.

I think they should make a galaxy, where each person starts out w/ 1 to 12 planets each, and their own star system. Each planet should be able to build one free cap ship of choice. Then again, that's how i just dream the game to be.

Plus, are they doing anything new with next patch, 1.04, or are they even making one as of?