First question how could I rewrite the post so that it is not incohesive,Raging Amish ?
Second, I like having more then one class of ships, myself. It adds a level of depth as it is then not a game, of who has the better upgraded and/ir larger fleet, but a game, of who can build the better comb. arms fleet, and use it. But the more I look at my "What do you guys, think space warfare should be like." post, and the more I read, on how space warfare should be like, form website, that have a element of respecting science, I find less reasons to have differnet class of ship.
There is no point, in having a tier one assult ship, and a tier 3. As you will rush the tier 1 without taking the time out to build up to tier 3 or you will tech up to tier 3 and skip tier 1 or even replace the old tier 1 warships.
Now if we only have one class of warship, we have a game, like ORB or Hegemonia Legions of Iron, where big ships allways win the day. What I'm trying to find out is if there are reasons (that are resources effective) to have more then one class of assult ship. So is there a reason to have different classes of assult ship?
Also some people on my post, say that there are no space fighters in space, with people on the other end agains it. I'm trying to "finish fight", by seeing if even if we had space fighter would they be useful? SO do you guy find fighters and bombers useful?
I know that patch 1.1 will changer the carriers, but will that make them more useful?