hey, wassup! long time no... er, type. Any new abilities in the works? It seems as though your cap ships erm, lack polish. I keep having to edit them to make em functional. Its a downer. THIS MOD ROCKS WOOKIEE SOCKS! which are 120% bigger than normal socks. Unless you're andre the giant.
[quote who="anteachtaire" reply="807" id="2891645"]also, Idk if you remember, but a long ass time ago I sent you guys the (updated) files for the executor from another SW mod... um, idk if that is the same model you're using, but the one you are using seems a bit too large. If you reduce its scale by about, say, 45-60%, it'd be much more aesthetically pleasing and such. 'cause right now it looks like lex steele.[/quote]
Yes, there are some new abilities in the works. Provided they don't take to long to get polished up, they should be in the update for Diplomacy 1.2 (which will be wonderful just for the performance increase ). Feel free to suggest some more if you have any ideas on the website's development forum.
As for the SSD, you'll have to talk to Jason about why it is the size it is, though it is a pretty easy fix. I'd like to know if its a pretty wide spread opinion first though.
The Victory IIC-class carrier Star Destroyer should really be a Venator-class Star Destroyer, the Venator is more of a carrier than the Victory II could ever be; if you really want a battlecruiser, the Imperial-class Star Battlecruiser would be a better choice (the Eclipse's escorts and the Allegiance from Dark Empire, almost certainly the Imperial Star Battlecruisers from the Imperial era).
I suppose it would be quite possible to switch the the roles of the Victory IIC and the Venator. If I'm thinking of the right Star Battlecruisers, those are bigger than the ISD classes (thus not comparable as the Victory/Venator are starting Capital ships), and actually the Venator is fulfilling the Siege capital role.