Who do you think wins in the HC department?
enforcers take up 12 supply vs 10 for the other 2
so 25 vs 30 should be fair right?
Using Entrenchment 1.03
Damage Slow/Normal/Fast Cost
destra 19.0 58 / 53 / 48 sec. $525 100m 90c
kodiak 18.0 60 / 55 / 50 sec. $500 100m 70c
Enforcer 20.0 72 / 65 / 60 sec. $625 150m 110c
300 supply calculations
Damage total build time on fast Cost
destra(30) 570 1440 sec. $15750 3000m 2700c
kodiak(30) 540 1500 sec. $15000 3000m 2100c
Enforcer(25) 500 1500 sec. $15625 3750m 2750c
V = Vasari
A = Advent
T = Tec
lvl 3 = All upgrades up to lvl 3 (damage, shields, armor, hp, combat abilities)
full ups = All combat upgrades possible (tec speed and vas slow ability not used)
V v A no ups 10 A
V v A lvl 3 15 A <-- This is just wrong
V v A full ups 16 A <-- So is this
V v T no ups 8 T
V v T lvl 3 17 T <-- Very broken (due to early upgrades)
V v T full ups 9 T
A v T no ups 4 T
A v T lvl 3 8 T
A v T full ups 12 A <-- Drastic Change
Basically Vas HC suck. They dont win any battles. 25 Enforcers cost the same as 30 HC
for the other 2 races yet they lose badly to their counter part. with equal upgrades
they lose more.
With no or little upgrades Tec HC rules
Advent HC will dominate if fully upgraded. Advent has the only cap ability to increase damage
Devs please rebalance.
Vas HC is tied with tec in terms as total build time. Cost wise they are 3875 more then advent HC and 8625 more then TEC HC If you do the standard 500 creds per 100 metal/crystal. So the test should be 22.4 VS 30 against advent and 18.6 vs 30 against TEc if you want to do cost vs cost for vas. For tec vs advent it would 30 vs 27.5. I cant imagine how skewed and screwed the test would be. Also Vas hc has the least amount of total damage.
So using again the standard 500 creds per metal/crystal HC cost
Vas Hc take up 20% fleet supply, cost 30.5% more then advent and 42.6% then TEC HC.