Interesting how no one has addressed the specific content of the article.
When you have nothing meaningful to contribute, resort to foaming at the mouth insults, name calling and mockery. [eye rolling smiley]
Throughout this thread, have I ever come across as an alarmist? Go ahead, and try to find a quote where I said the sky was falling.
It doesn't concern you in the least that a climate change denier was funded by those with a financial interest in maintaining the denial?
The reason why I posted this was because it was mentioned over and over in this thread how the climate change alarmist were lying. It's rather ironic, that the climate change deniers, had the appearance of (but probably more than that) of a conflict of interest.
For those of you who may not understand what a conflict of interest is, I'll provide an example: You own a widget factory. The factory produces pollutants. Laws requiring you to purchase equipment to reduce the pollutants cost money. Additional cost reduce profits. You don't want your profits reduced, so you pay someone to do a study to show your pollutants are harmless. Since you are funding the researcher, he is more than likely to have bias in your favor...so that you'll hire him again next time. Because if his results don't tell the narrative you want your audience to hear, he'll be out of a job.
And yes, obviously this applies to the climate change alarmists as well.
