technically yes, but we aren't dealing with a far-off theory here. its about metallic latticies.(Remove the I after c) something taught in even elementary chem. you can find theories that deny deny(One deny) darwinian(Capital D) evolution, but would you listen to them? I hope not. Next time you want to emphatic something just use something they teach in Elementary School named adjective in English Classes. then obv
See what I meant Lordkosc?
Lordkosc do you call this bickering normal? Me and Ninja bickering around
it isnt a makeup term. just because it doesnt exist on wikipedia doesnt mean its not a bona fide word. As far I know you are the only human that is using this term. I am sure you can figure out the rest. that you dont realize that they are the same thing proves this statement Are you implying that positive ions in sea of lattice and protons forming metallic bonds themselves are the one and the same? If yes then wh
you shame all that is chemistry. Then say metallic bond not metallic lattice. Because you shame chemistry with makeup phrase, malapropism, and lack of caveat lector. Metallic bonds involve atoms with sparsely filled valence electron shells sharing electrons in a diffuse manner, with the electrons delocalized throughout the lattice. Notice lack of metallic lattice. Lattice of positive ions(Can proton themselves flo
There isn't any kind of parallel research current in beta afaik.
They used to allow pre-62 patch however as of 62 patch it has been this way since then look up this link. 62 patch notes link Look at the top for the various patch notes.
only denying the ones that dont exist. the occasional "your, you're" mistake is far better than the myriad of simple errors that you're making. Again you are denying your mistake capitals/punctuations. I am not hiding my errors however you are hiding your grammar errors by attacking my grammar again. The correct form of the above sentence should be as the follow sentence. Only Denying the ones that don't exist. The occasional "your, you're" mistake is far bet
over a year Apparently they was working on it in secret since Warcraft III: Frozen Throne came out.
Research station only give you access to more technology not parallel research. For example, You build one research station you get access to tier 1 and 2 but not 3, 4, 5, and 6. You have to build more research station to gain tiers. Tier being the horizontal row from bottom to top. Research station give you 2 tiers. Any more question?
Your grammar is still also foundation of bad grammars error too. Look below for an example. you didnt REFER to it, you used it in context first. I will let the audience decide on this by the method of ALT+F. I first refer to crystal lattice and metal yes however you were the first one to utilize hybrid of two property together. Bare Proton is attractive to electron and thus form a bond. How could you miss this part?(Think Diatomic)
Everybody watch out for Sarah Kerrigan!
no kidding, I never thought :MASSIVE roll eyes: hydrogen is a solitary proton, therefore the use of plural implies either the case of more protons in the nucleus, or more protons flying around. taking half a look at context reveals exactly what I meant. I only saw single Hydrogen with multiples proton reveal a "grave grammar mistakes". well then, how about you dont use the same text yourself? Referring to you
I was asking not pointing to someone else you twit. I didn't try to understand political reason however I can understand the afterward effect of a political action without understanding the action itself. (I don't try to understand what cause ripple in water rather the ripple's effect on beach. Beach being NASA and ripple being the action of Bush Sr.) One) Would you rather has 10 dollar taxes on each family no matter what? Or better yet just one cent add to the sale taxes? That
you are talking about multiple protons bound together by electromagnetic force, you cannot create metallic hydrogen with ONE proton. Wait a moment if hydrogen(Single Atom) has more than one proton then it would certainly be reclassify as a helium. If you are talking hydrogen"s" then it wasn't clear. You know that change the amount of proton in atom also change the element right? Wikipedia-Hydrogen:The most common naturally occurring isotope of h
that a child will compare his own intellect to any president is quite laughable. you may not like his policies, but its also quite obvious that you dont(') understand the motivation behind them. I am a child comparing someone else intellect to any president? Is this what you meant? I am not discussing the motivation, rather the action that did take place no more no less. Input being not fix amount each years. The best solution is little
Have you ever taken an economics class? Ever? Go down to your local community college and take the macroeconomics class. And while you're there, take a few English classes too. I am interpreting his English best as I could consider he don't check his sentences for errors/horrible concepts. Have you ever own a trillion of trillions cash in hand?(Wasn't referring to exact number and Govt Bureaucracy 101, The more money an agency has the more likely th
its because of metastability that metal-crystals would make better shields. metastability is a persistant(tent not tant) dual state that decays slowly. a great example is a rock on the perch of a hill. the thing is that excitation will cause rapid decay, symmetry collapse would cause your metastable hydrogen to collapse from its metal form into a gas rapidly. as a result you really could not find a worse object for radiation shielding; something that evaporate
1) its needs 2) how does not having an influx of funds benefit research? and when did I imply inflation? that was nowhere in there. One) What is needing here? Two) Influx can be interpret as either plenty or insane amount which was why I see it as inflation. there is only ONE bush who had a father in office, you twit. I dare you to admit you are an anti-twit <img src="http://images.star
This thread has turned into the biggest train wreck on the forums; talk about a going off track and derailing... I am feeling the same thing.
My comment make your Victory over me completely nullified.(However you can for TGE, not to insult you TGE) Wikipedia-Metastable as Nuclear Isomer: A nuclear isomer is a metastable state of an atomic nucleus caused by the excitation of one or more of its protons or neutrons or both. A nuclear isomer occupies a higher energy state than the corresponding non-excited nucleus, called the ground state. The nuclear isomer will sooner or later release the extra energy and decay into the gro
ask him for me how having a massive influx of funds bloating our rather measly space program is a nightmare for engineers (dammit, he should want this) or scientists. I would really like to understand the concept behind that, its illogical from any perspective I can think of. I wasn't talking about massive influx of funds(You are implying inflation which is the last thing anyone need). Rather better congress fund(No more of those sneaky budget cuts) and
I have only talk about bird for one post which meant I did more than talk about love birds.(Notice I said bird !=Love Bird)
Columbia was an unforseen(fore not for) accident, not a bungling of funds. Some people could argue that it was foreseen(Example, engineer on ground requiring good picture of the puncture wound and become aware of possible dangerous reentry). the scientific community is looking forward to it as well. Really? My dad is an engineer(Contractor to NASA mean He work for them). He saying to go to Mars is an eng
Update the link is working now.
