Funkodrom

Mine: [link="http://www.counterglow.com/article.php?id=sinsofasolarempire"]http://www.counterglow.com/article.php?id=sinsofasolarempire[/link]

My review: [link="http://www.counterglow.com/article.php?id=sinsofasolarempire"] http://www.counterglow.com/article.php?id=sinsofasolarempire[/link]

Do you know why?

Like in Civ 4? It would be a big hit with my girlfriend if you could play like that. :) If Civ 4 is any guide it'd really only be of any practical use in single player. You'd have to sacrifice too much military to concentrate on pushing culture and not many human opponents would let you get away with that.

I only bought Sins yesterday and I don't know how long I'm going to want to play it (it's v. promising so far!) so I'm answering based on my experiences of other vaguely comparable games like Warcraft III, Dawn of War, Civ 4. If I really enjoy playing a game I tend to buy the expansions. Sometimes they are good value, sometimes they aren't. Often the expansion will inspire me to start playing a game that I've put down for a few months again. I'm not a hardcore gamer, I wouldn

I downloaded the demo on Saturday, played the tutorials and a sample game then bought the full thing online on Sunday. I've played a lot of RTS and TBS games so most of the concepts were pretty familiar to me but even then at the end of the tutorials I'd have liked to be able to continue and play around a bit. I'm really not bothered about the lack of a single player campaign. Most RTS campaigns that I've played since the original Command and Conquer have been built around introducing