[quote]I personally don’t like the level of wealth inequality. It offends my sense of fairness. But I can’t think of any solutions to it that don’t essentially involve stealing from one group and handing it to another “just because”. It’s one of the reasons why I don’t like a strong federal government, it just creates more opportunity for the gamification of our economic system (talk to a successful hedge fund manager – federal regulations make
boshimi336
Anyone one else take the test? Post up some pics!!! [e digicons]:D[/e]
[e digicons]:D[/e]
Huh ... never really thought about this but I think it's cool. :-P Any really awesome / lengthy / highly rated deep space ones out there? [e digicons]:D[/e]
[quote who="Lord Xia" reply="5" id="3325280"]I'm not sure I am entirely against free-to-play+ micro-transactions. I just worry how far down the slippery slope some games and companies will slide. How bare bones will games be when released[/quote] Agreed. For me, a good example of a free-2-play multiplayer game with transactions ... that don't break the game .. is World of Tanks.
TS7 you rock. :-)
Yeah *sigh* ... Was a huge fan of Battlefield 2 for the PC with the Project Reality mod ... bought BF3 and was more or less dissapointed (outside of the graphics). Guess this means BF4 is finally going to drive the rest of the BF players away. *sigh* How does their slogan go? EA: Challenge Everything <span style="
Looks like things are more or less back to normal. Buttons only show up when I mouse over them but other than that, not a big deal. Win7 x64 17.0 here at work, 18 at home. Icon's are still goofy. Other than the Stardock specific (FE / GC / SoaSE) adds, I see nothing. I also use Ad-Block+ so that's a nice feature I guess. Viewing through the SoaSE portal.
[quote who="Ryat" reply="8136" id="3325175"] No our resident G_Bison.[/quote] Which I believe is a reference to Zoids: Chaotic Century ... though I could be wrong. [e digicons]:D[/e]
I still see absolutely nothing in the forums ... at all. No buttons. :-P Firefox 18.0.2
Something different every day ... I can no longer edit posts ... interesting. :-P
axxo2 ... wow man. I LOVE this one! :-D Any chance of a TEC frigate crashing into a desert? :-P
Excited! Love me some capital ships with flak guns! ^_^
[quote who="Darvroth" reply="3951" id="3323393"]TobiWahn, Possible mitigation to the vagueness of the black cube ship models. Would it be easy to replace the black cubes with a cube of a different color for each faction still requiring cubes, that way at least a player could tell which cubes were from his race? It would not help if there were two or more of the same race but otherwise would address some concerns from the forum. Thoughts?[/quote] Ju
... does that mean they prioritize pirates versus other players? I have seen that aspect of the behavior before ...
[e digicons]o_O[/e]
"Wake me up, before you Go-A ..." [e digicons]O:)[/e]
Cool!
Posted Feb 3rd, 2004 ... response Feb 20th, 2013? Huzzah! [e digicons]:D[/e]
I'm mostly excited that this might finally push full adoption of 64-bit games for the PC as a result ... yay!
[e digicons]:O[/e]
[quote who="SG23" reply="3948" id="3322105"]Is there already a rebellion release that I've missed?[/quote] Nothing official SG23. I believe it is all internal builds at the moment.
That is amazing axxo!
[quote who="Darvroth" reply="3943" id="3321752"]What race gets the next Rebellion tech tree review? Is there another one that has a civil war? I'm open to input.[/quote] Well, as always I would challenge the notion of whether or not each race needs to be split into two factions. In some cases (for example: Narn or Centauri) might not have enough content or material available to truly make splitting them into two factions worthwhile from a game standpoint. On to