suggestions for new ones?
RomanDA
[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="6" id="2511721"]Gadgets are damn near impossible to do anything with. The best solution is the above suggestion. Sorry.[/quote] there is a reason for that.. its called "intellectual property", some of us "Gadget" makers would like to be able to TRY and make some $ back from all the hundreds (if not thousands) of hours spent on some of these gadgets. And having it so that someone could simply go to "Builder mode" and do what they want w
[quote]How about just asking MikeB directly, the maker of the gadgets ? Perhaps You can even work together and fix it ? He really is a nice guy.[/quote] I agree, if someone comes to me telling me something is broken, normally i will do my best to fix it, unless its a dead product, and if so, i might even give someone else the code to do it themselves.
dude you ROCK!
sViz, If im looking for something from the system ill do a google search like "WMI Process Memory Usage" and it will show all kinds of things. you end up with something like this: http://aspalliance.com/806_CodeSnip_Get_memory_size_usage_using_WMI_and_NET_20 some cool things out there.
[quote who="sViz" reply="6" id="2509203"]Cool code. [/quote] There is soo much WMI can do, the best way to play with it is to download the WMI Code Creator i have used it on XP, Vista and 7 and it works on all of them, granted there are things that are not there on 7 that were there in XP, etc. But at least you can try out code snippits w
Jsut add [code="vbscript"] ' add this to the timer, or loop your using to check to see if the process is running Call GetMemSize("Firefox") ' Then in the function (if you want to swap STATES - much better idea than pictures) Function GetMemSize(Procs) Set objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:\\.\root\CIMV2") sql = "SELECT * FROM Win32_Process where Caption Like '%" & Procs & "%'"<br
WMI is what is used to check on the memory usage or anything else about a running process. procs = name of process to check for [code="vbscript"] Function GetMemSize(Procs) strComputer = "." Set objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:\\" & strComputer & "\root\CIMV2") sql = "SELECT * FROM Win32_Process where Caption Like '%" & Procs & "%'" Set colItems = objWM
Cool Zu, never heard of that. I think that would be a totally different project then DX is now, and would require some MAJOR work on SD's part.. but it could move it into a whole new way or working. If there was a "beginner" and "advanced" interface, that might be really cool. The Beginner one would have code "Blocks" to move around ie: READ FILE, and you click it and it asks for hte file name, or var. I love the idea of these kinds of code "blocks".
[quote]Offtopic : I would like to give Karma to willistuder for his summary, but either I really can't or I forgot how.[/quote] simply hit the thubs-up btn at the bottom of the post you want to give Karma to.
willistuder, wholy crap what a post.
I do not believe thats possible with the activex plugin for the browser, but i may be wrong.
no vbscript.. wow.. this will be no joy for me. Learning another new language.. dont know if i have any time to devote to that. But will have to see.
Brad, I would love to see a list of goals for 4.0 and what would be on SD's plate vs whats on ours. It would help everyone focus on the positive side of things, like where you see DX going, or not going. Also, What we should be testing, at each release, so we are not bringing up things that are not yet implemented. Are we to start on the current beta or wait? If you are looking for ideas on what "we" the community are after there a
I would hate to see DX die, it is the only think out there like it. I would love to see DX used in schools to teach students programming, can you imagine the influx of gadgets? But im also a realist, i know that the market isnt there like it was years ago, and i know that Win7 has added a lot of problems for DX. If there were easier ways to make some more complex thing, i think DX could sell a lot more, but again, who knows.
I think the overall theme of this thread is the overwelming desire to have a great DX 4.0 something that people could use to make some really great things. And yes as always there is a lot of bitching, but thats normal. I think the concern is 2 fold, first is the quality of the beta (something i have not used as i need to work on some things still in 3.5), and secondly and i think the main thing is the lack of imput from SD. We all have the desire to see DX 4
keep hoping someone from SD will at least comment
[quote]The time when I had enough $$ to work on gadgets is in the past. It was a great hobby but it couldn't show me a way to be rich. [/quote] This I understand, i have to do the same, and its why im not here doing DX things. Keep hoping ill make a living at it, but it isnt happening, nor looks like it ever will.
[quote]Then I'll stop any using of DX. I'm too busy for this now...[/quote] makes me VERY sad, you are truely the master of all DX could and should be.
[quote]Excuse me David but I really can't figure out why I find any information about VBScript, WMI, DLL, etc... in Google.com (en-us) even without understanding English but a lot of US and UK people can't do the same? What is it - a trivial laziness or inability to work with Search Engines? It's very strange...[/quote] it only works if i know what to look for, and since i have never used VB Studio its not an area i have looked into. I have googled all kinds of things, it is
Vad, very cool,. will have to see what i can do, im not an expert on all that dll stuff at all.
Vad, Would love to see how your doing the dll call.
I believe the 2 are connected
[quote who="c242" reply="123" id="2476287"] since Zu left This thread or Stardock ?[/quote] YES
I think that based on the non-input of SD since Zu left shows us all where DX stands.