SetarcosNous

SetarcosNous

Joined Member # 2465194
1 Posts 113 Replies 276 Reputation

[quote]Please answer my "Space Shuttle" analogy.[/quote] Maybe you missed it, I did answer it in reply #196. To add to it, appearance of design is not necessarily and indicator of such. Look at the aerodynamics of a raindrop. Of course, not understanding the physics behind surface tension and air friction, you'll probably say "God" designed raindrops that way. [quote]Again, I cannot explain how God came to be. That is beyond anyone's comprehension. That is something that we will

467 Replies 801,340 Views

[quote]To believe that we "just happened", be it from a bolt of lightning or the Big Bang... would be the same as saying that the Space Shuttle just happened... there was this big pile of parts laying around somewhere, and a big explosion threw all the parts together into a working Space Shuttle.[/quote] The watchmaker argument is one of the worst there is. For one, though statistically improbable ([B]almost[/B] impossible), it is very remotely possible for that watch/shuttle to happen

467 Replies 801,340 Views

[quote]Who says that the appendix didn't serve some purpose while you were in the womb?[/quote] Who says it did? Appendix aside, I certainly would have made beings with good enough judgment to never have "fallen" in the first place. [quote]No fair using stuff GOD created.[/quote] First you'd have to prove God created it. Maybe it has always been here. [quote]YOU evolutionists just CAN'T answer this question[/quote] And you can't decide on a question. [quote

467 Replies 801,340 Views

[quote]STILL doesn't answer the question[/quote] Did you give up your sense of humor with your reason? It is no trouble at all to "NOT accept an intelligent designer". Especially since I could have designed things much more intelligently. Anyone here need their appendix?

467 Replies 801,340 Views

[quote]But who created the aliens?[/quote] No one created them, they just always existed outside of time (not that anything outside of time can not always exist). They used their advanced technology to insert themselves into our time stream, but lacking the reasoning capabilities we have developed to understand such things as cause and effect, they prompted crashed into that volcano the other poster was talking about. :p

467 Replies 801,340 Views

Maybe because many people would not agree with the first Starcraft being the "greatest RTS" of any decade. [quote]We are talking blizzard here.... They will do an impressive game[/quote] [quote]That would be a first...[/quote] Seriously, I have never seen what people love about Blizzard so much. While I wouldn't say they make crappy games, they've never made one that could hold my interest... and I am more of an OCD person than an ADD one. [quote]playing games like

232 Replies 591,645 Views

[quote]being on patrol would not change the likelihood of you being in the right place at the right time[/quote] [quote]I acceded that point...moving around still increases your chances of being in the right place at the right time over standing still. Granted you have an equal chance to be in the wrong place, but it's still better than doing nothing and sitting there.[/quote] How can you accede a point, and then immediately after state the contrary? If the chances of you being

12 Replies 23,050 Views

I loved Pax Imperia 2, I still play it on occasion. I know I played the hell out of IG2 also, but I haven't played it for years. I can't quite recall why I stopped, I think I was waiting for a patch that never came. I've played GalCiv2 quite a bit also, but I always end up playing the role of "ship designer" more than that of "emperor".

42 Replies 46,741 Views