kwm1800

kwm1800

Joined Last seen Member # 3127229
35 Posts 321 Replies 2,021 Reputation
Reply to Tyr clarifys on Capitol ship in Strategy Sins Forums

That's really self-defeating argument. Balanced out only in late game does not indicate that the capitals are balanced, because former statement clearly implies that capitals are NOT balanced in early game (well, even saved for support caps) So indeed Akkan is a bit decent in late game with ion bolt with crazy amount of AM, but this point is moot if my Akkan dies early due to being weak in early game. Not balanced is not balanced, there is no othe

6 Replies 3,252 Views
Reply to A New Idea - Flak for Capital Ships - a humble change. Developers please read. in Sins of a Solar Empire Sins Forums

Hack, first of all, we can change the Capital ships flaks to attack strikecrafts only. So your point is completely invalid in first place. Hmmm, that already takes out your stupid first two 'concerns', right? Now third one: No it is not, even with 2~3 to 6~7 flak power the fighters will tear aparts LRMs before you blink. Guys, don't deceive yourselves; strikecrafts ARE FREE. I wonder how many you guys ever understand this very crucial issu

178 Replies 833,390 Views
Reply to Capital Ships NEED major rework: here is proposal. (Updated 3/23/09 again) in Strategy Sins Forums

[quote] I would like to say is that I dislike how you target almost every ability, even if they do scale well. Maybe Kol's flak burst does need a AM buff, maybe it doesn't, but the fact remains that it scales well as fleets get larger, so it doesn't really fit with the theme of your topic. I also think that some abilities (such as magnetize and EMP charge) do scale well because they can be used against capital ships. If caps are stronger, then anti-cap disruption abi

87 Replies 203,915 Views
Reply to Capital Ships NEED major rework: here is proposal. (Updated 3/23/09 again) in Strategy Sins Forums

All you need for singleplayer is just fixing the AI to follow according changes. Done. Really, all you need is just change AI to make sure it uses newly revised abilities (but in current state AI does not anyway) It won't affect singleplayer experience much since usually both player and AI do not use capital ship abilities. We may bring much more drastic change and imbalance if we fix the AI to use more LRFs ;)

87 Replies 203,915 Views
Reply to Tyrs lesson on Capitol ships in Strategy Sins Forums

[quote who="transitive" reply="25" id="2075110"]what we all know is this: starting from scratch with full anti-matter a Jarrasul beats almost everything in 1v1.(maybe a Radiance can beat it) what we neglect to talk about is that fights enver start from scratch. a single cap ship can't be everywhere at once, particularly one as slow as a Colonizer cap. phase jumps happen. reinforcements happen. opponents with surprising strategies happen. <br

41 Replies 154,923 Views
Reply to Capital Ships NEED major rework: here is proposal. (Updated 3/23/09 again) in Strategy Sins Forums

By the way, those who saying TEC capitals ships need to be weak in abilities due to race difference are lying to themselves. 1.) The basic stat (hp, dps, etc) are virtually negiliable. Look numbers and do math yourselves. 2.) A claim that TEC's economy is superior to others is plain lie; Advent and Vasari have good ways to get much better economy than TEC. If you don't know this you have not played enough. 3.) Finally, ALL c

87 Replies 203,915 Views
Capital Ships NEED major rework: here is proposal. (Updated 3/23/09 again) in Strategy Sins Forums

News (3/23) : I am working on evaulation mod now. I am working on TEC side. Now it is done. Download The changes made in this evaulation mod are a bit different from the ones posts here, due to either my lacking skill on modding and/or limitations on engine/hard wired settings. Now you can download this. To people who play singleplayer only

87 Replies 203,915 Views
Reply to Tyrs lesson on Capitol ships in Strategy Sins Forums

The game is NOT BALANCED. As everyone says, WE ALL KNOW we should go for teh egg for the most of the time (or mothership, or Mazda, etc) That's not balanced. Quite many capital ships need some SERIOUS BUFF for their abilities. I think only the egg, mothership and Mazda (in lesser degree) are balanced as capitals (hence they are the ones built as the first capital.) others are having some serious problems in many regards.

41 Replies 154,923 Views
Reply to Tyrs lesson on Capitol ships in Strategy Sins Forums

Tyr, let me just ask a question: do you think capital ships in general are balanced well? My biggest grief is that there are some capitals which just don't do their jobs very well and not even worth considering (i.e Sova in big map) As I said again and again, maybe exception of support capital ships, the players should not be penalized for not picking a specific ship (egg, Mazda, mothership) for their first cap. I want to use Vasari siege cap as a first cap. I t

41 Replies 154,923 Views
Reply to A New Idea - Flak for Capital Ships - a humble change. Developers please read. in Sins of a Solar Empire Sins Forums

Hack, stop trolling. The pictures alone make this thread great, it is not usual to see worthful thread like this. And as I suggested, I think it is good idea (whether it is old or not.) P.S Btw Hack, sins of solar empire is based on WWI/II era, not modern warfare. If it was, we should not have "battleships" "battlecruisers" (they don't exist in modern era anymore) but just destroyers (wow, we don't hav

178 Replies 833,390 Views
[Suggestion] Replace Ring of Fire with.... in Demigod Ideas Demigod Forums

....Meteor. Yes, given the fact that TB's hp is just woo weak, Ring of Fire does not work too well because TB needs to be close to enemies. Other than killing creeps, it is useless against demigod. Instead I want to see Meteor like one in Diable I/II... smaller damage radius than rain of ice and slightly more casting time (0.5 sec) but do more damage. -wnmnkh-

19 Replies 2,233 Views
Reply to Carrier's are NOT over-powered in Strategy Sins Forums

[quote who="Cykur" reply="11" id="2070580"] Can we just Get LFs to have 175% vs Heavy Armour. Its so simple. Do a small balance change like this. See how it goes in games. Its going to be a bit easier for LFs to kill carriers (which is the problem) , but the strikecraft are still the same. LF's chew carriers up right now!!! I don't understand why people think they don't! Just like LRF chew up LF! The only people who I see having a problem with this are t

87 Replies 181,741 Views