The first bug is really serious. This just killed multiplayer.
kwm1800
Btw, if notice, the range blast range of this ability is quite huge (omg 10000), that means..... If you didn't act fast enough, do not have any units to interrupt, and just see Mazda shooting missiles, the chances are that more than 50% of your army is gone after 20 sec, while other 50% of your army is heavily damaged already. Be careful when you are against TEC players (usually the ones choose Mazda as their first cap). The
Yes. It is down again.
Carriers need to fall back and regroup. Period. No matter any situation. Here's a thing; the problem is when your fighters and/or bombers got eliminated by his airforce, there is 0% your carriers ever produce fighters to contribute the battle. Carriers make strikecrafts quite slowly, and this means as soon as new fighters are building, the enemy's fighters will kill them instantly. In the end, your carriers would not be able to place a single squadron, m
Calm down. It is happening recently.
down again
That's one of the greatest news.
don't they just move extremely slowly when it is activated? thats' what I know.
Same here.
So, people still have good values about what is really love about. I am glad to hear this news.
Who is the person on the left side of the pic? *nevermind, I just found out ;)
Well, so far Obama will win PA landslide. So much for the wasted money, McCain. :/
NO, I mean Red Alert 3. Go to online now, it is completely dead.
[quote who="Coelocanth" reply="5" id="1923294"]Well, you get the 'complete' game, but my understanding is if you want to play as a different race, you have to buy the other game releases. Bad move, IMO, unless they're releasing each version for around a third the cost of a 'normal' single title.[/quote] Not true, you only get a single play campaign for each faction for each package. In multiplayer, you can play all three races. By t
Come on guys, he deserves more Karmas. ;)
There will be three micro-expansions total, and there would be a retail pack consisted of all of micro-expansions. But it would be really, really take some time (probably next year's Christmas?)
There is virtually NO change in poll since he started an aggressive campaign on PA. Obama is still leading in double digits, and PA has been blue state for a long time and I really don't think I would see red on the election day. This is completely waste of time and money; he really needs to focus on Flordia, Ohio, Virginia (I believe he can take back) and for god's sake, North Carolina. If he can regain/defend these state and get some of west states bac
Mr. Silver from 5308.com wrote a article for McCain. http://www.nypost.com/seven/10252008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/mccains__long__road_to_electoral_win_135233.htm Well, other than the fact that there is whooping 5% chance to happen (wait, the chance has been lowered to 4.3% today), it is interesting to read. Here are some of my remarks. 1) Yes, he needs to give up PA. Just simply WTF he is doing there? 2) Ah, 'gaining back' (no
By the way guys, I see some people are mentioning real-war situations here, let me contribute.... First of all, the reason those heavy cruisers and battleships got destroyed fairly easily in WWII is because it was the transaction to modern warfare (Air force dominant) and those big ships were the victioms of the change. In fact, they were useful in WWI where there was little or no airforce existed to kill the battleships. In the battleship vs. battleship battles
[quote who="little-whip" reply="5" id="1914023"]That would be West BY GOD Virginia! The Virginia I live in, the part that contains this ugly, crumbling, crime ridden, blight infected, shit-stinking mess of the 'Capitol City' (aka Richmond) sucks the big wazoo.[/quote] That's not a really good way to describe.... XD By the way, just read about Sen. Bachmann's It is a silly, dump, stupid mistake ever can be made. *f
Huh? Never heard that West Virginia is an illegal state, either. Please explain to us.
Wow, I don't know how this can be a good article, since this is one piece of a big FUD writing. So, all of these changes will be negative to Americans? If left-wing supermajority will be bad, then how about what did the six-year right-wing supermajority brought to Americans? You may argue that the article never said the changes will be 'bad', but we all can feel a strong negativety from the tones and word usage, like this "Americans voting for "change" should know they
So, I read that 24th comment on this thread and followed all of this evolution debate here. Well, personally I think it is wrong to promote Intelligent Science into school, since it is mere opinion (not even psudoscience, if you ask me) but here we have some believers so I won't touch this further. I believe, other than science issues, I really don't see she is disqualified as a vice president. She is inexperienced, so what? Obama is also relatively inexperienced. I thi
Thanks for all the replies, guys. I think about this whole issue again, and this is my several newly discovered points on this issue. 1) The number of capital ships are always small in the first place. In current system, it is virtually impossible to build a multiple cap ships unless you completely give up your main forces (frigates, cruisers) and effiency. 2) This means that capital ships are very valuable targets all the time, always cau
This thread is for Palin, but why do I see evolution debate here?