The rest of the computer's stuff can run in the other half. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Kitkun
They've said they are updated the graphics, so probably there will be a change in minimum requirements. Unknown how much, though. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Somehow, I doubt Skynet will have it's start with Sins. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
The truth hurts. [e digicons]O:)[/e] Edit: As for the OP... I have my pride. [e digicons]:hrmph:[/e] [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote who="Sinperium" reply="35" id="2979442"]I remember when we made up games and played them outside.[/quote]Sounds horrible. [e digicons]8C[/e] [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
If you have the original CD, you could install that and get it. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
https://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/410961 [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
The Celeron series survived past the Pentiums, though in this case, I believe that is one of the P4 based ones. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
No. It'll be free to play online. F2P is a model where you don't pay anything for the game itself, but instead pay for some features of the game to be unlocked. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
From what little we hear, I'm guessing these are more like SupCom1's Game Enders. Massively expensive and slow to deploy... and apocalyptically powerful. Average MP games won't see one at all. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Depends on the processor make, actually. A single 2.4 core of a brand new Core-series processor may well outperform an old P4 running at 3.6. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
I'm gonna need a loan to get all the games that look good... [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote who="GoaFan77" reply="5" id="2978401"]Who cares about this ultimate solar flare? If myfist watches Fox the world is truly over. [/quote]Pretty much what I thought, too. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Yarlen ran out of booze. It'll take a couple weeks to fill the tanks. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
It's one of the places where the AI comes out quite nicely. Mitigation was supposed to be the final nail for focus fire tactics, but the numbers for it are off badly. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Meh, it's only got a 6.7. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
And suddenly, this is the funniest thread on the board. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Can't say I've done anything with 40K, myself. Never really been interested in it. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="12" id="2977898"]By no means do I want a flamewar; such would be detrimental to both sides.[/quote]This thread is nothing but and was not intended to be anything beyond flamebait. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
They announced it early in development. So? [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
Better than the Skirantra which fires it's bombardment beams from it's hangars. [e digicons]:P[/e] [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
The UI for SotS is very clunky. You can't see who has NAPs without scrolling over the info in the Diplomacy Screen, you can't see how close your tech is to being finished without scrolling over the research box, simply moving a ship takes 3 clicks, scrolling all around the tech tree is a PITA, rebellions and outbreaks have no audio notifications and can easily be missed if you're waiting a couple turns, etc... (For a tech tree done right, SoaSE.) A bigger problem though is
[quote who="SithLordAJ" reply="13" id="2977280"]Yarlen, I'd like to make the request that if you are adding/changing/messing with the tutorial levels, that they be made moddable (if possible). I ask for this because the tutorials have triggers, objectives, and a number of other features that a modder could use to make a single player campaign, if given this power.[/quote]I suspect that that has got a small chance of happening. There's a reason the devs have waited until now to mess wi
[quote who="Whiskey144" reply="605" id="2977401"]Out of all the Enterprises, I personally liked the Sovereign the best.......though I think the Defiant beats it out any day.[/quote]I very much like the Sovereign myself, though I love the look of the Intrepid, too. Not exactly keen on the USS Hockey Puck -er... Defiant . [e digicons]:fox:[/e]
As the above post illustrates, 'good-spirited' is quite rare for ICO. [e digicons]:fox:[/e]