ovi_187

ovi_187

Joined Member # 3351286
18 Posts 56 Replies 8,360 Reputation

its been a while since I have been here.... anyways i have an idea im hpoing one of you guys might look into, since i cant due to time constraints. when i was sifting through the original sins files, i noticed that whenever the avent iconus guardian uses its shield projection ability, the game renders a sphere to size of a planet (look into the entity and particle files). lategame, when avent fleets have multiple guardians, using this ablity results in the game slowing t

326 Replies 701,771 Views

FredLed, if i remember correctly, there was a discussion on these forums on capital ship models from the SINS beta. one of the posters there mentioned that SINS beta had code that allowed TEC flak guns to shoot at phase and normal TEC missiles......see if u can dig that discussion up and see if that code still works.

20 Replies 8,471 Views

[quote who="-Ue_Carbon" reply="346" id="2480600"]Aye your right, but he asked how it can be done. So I provided an answer [/quote] carbon, sorry for not being clear, i was being sarcastic when i asked that question, i know that avent research allows them to spy on planets under their culture...what i meant to ask how Exile plans on spy on planets or wreck economies with ONLY the DE, which only provides a non stacking 5.0 culture spread rate, which can be countered just by h

913 Replies 1,705,061 Views

[quote who="CallenExile" reply="335" id="2479148"]It's not a combat weapon, it's espionage. Kill your enemy's econ from behind enemy lines. It's duration cancels out the need for direct alliegience drop. If you add this, people could scatter steal planets, build a culture center here and there, then hit everything in between, owned or not, with deliverance and steal 50% of owned planets minimum with almost no work at all, and no defense. Tha makes it far MORE powerful

913 Replies 1,705,061 Views

just by looking at the title.....i thought frogboy was scolding the diplomacy beta players who were complaining that the pirates are too strong now, ........lol btw, frogboy, are u reffering to any patricular article related to pc piracy??

48 Replies 117,333 Views

iff u look at the entity files, ull see that cost of research goes up by 5% but speed of research is increased by 20%...so not exactly sumthin i wanna use

4 Replies 3,979 Views

HOLY S**T look at the pacts................ btw, shouldnt the structure and tactical slots pacts belong to TEC and avent respectively?? given the fact that those 2 factions have research for them?? other that that keep you the good work

85 Replies 51,126 Views

[quote who="Deceiver_0" reply="312" id="2469784"] Ovi, DE is on my mind, but I need some recommendations for fixes. Also demobots is similar to suppression on the subjugator. Subjugators have to channel AND face their target, demo bots dont have to channel (as far as i know), so I don't think its a bug. Hoshis are good suport frigs as is, I dont think they need any adjustments. [/quote] here's mine - instead of the culture rate being 5, quadruple it to 20.....and make it sta

913 Replies 1,705,061 Views

Deceiver_0 umm.....are u gonna put up the poll regarding the buff to the deliverance engine or what?? also, remember how u put up a fill out form on your last thread?? it would be nice if you could put that up again, I bought this up some time ago, but that discussion got nowhere,.....its about hoshiko's repair

913 Replies 1,705,061 Views

[quote who="Darvin3" reply="206" id="2459663"]Jam Weapons changed from an instantaneous ability to an effect over time ability, and they reused the animation. I personally think it's fine.[/quote] This is fine by you?? if u say so.... [IMG]http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/8672/screenshot01v.jpg[/IMG] btw deceiver, are u willing to put up a yay/nay for a buff/nerf of the deliverance engine?? methinks it will be a good topic to debat

913 Replies 1,705,061 Views

instead of making 2 seperate posts, i decided to combine them into one. Again these topics were bought up before but not discussed in detail (however, i belive n3rull was vocal about the second one), so in the eve of the new expansion, i have decided to bring them up again. 1. the vasari fighter SC fires phase missiles just like the bomber. while PM are useful, it is kind of irritating to see them on just about every vasari ship. i suggest that the fighter SC's weapon gets changed to

8 Replies 8,054 Views

I have suggested this before and since this expanson focueses on diplomacy, it seems like a perfect time to mention this again. Give allies the ability or buy, trade or lease capital ships from each other. It will add more strategic possibilities and depth to the game. Personally i would like nothng better when playing as an avent to borrow a vulkoras or mazra for planet cleanup, or a skiranta for a aoe healing effect for my fleet, the list goes on and on....... [e digicons]:)[/e] &nb

1 Replies 2,888 Views

The recent changelog says that the chance of disruptive strikes have bee reduced from 35% to 25%...but actually the chace of activation is at 30%.....it was nerfed but not that much... [e digicons]:grin:[/e]

0 Replies 7,476 Views

[quote who="MasonOfSparta" reply="33" id="2394644"]I'm not saying it's an impossible technology, once you can control systems that let you move at relativistic speeds launching missiles into a ship, or a planet, or a moon, or just some dude floating in space probably isn't terribly hard. I'm just saying I can understand why the initial design didn't take ground based defenses into consideration. This may be something we could look into for the future, but for now diplomatic additions are prob

88 Replies 35,637 Views