Kruppe

yes!

try and update via impulse that may fix it

try

that sux, geuss you got unlucky email [email protected] and they should fix youright up

impulse let's you save it so you can install offline afaik

afaik it should chasnge to english if you update via impulse

it's on the back of the manuel

hint.... beta forum

[quote]To clarify, if I buy a game at a store (whether if it is new or unused is irrelevant), and this game contains some critical bugs making the game crash, not run, run poorly, etc, regardless if I am with an internet connection I should be able to get a patch for that. After all that is what patches are, they're patching it up because it's flawed/broken/whatever.[/quote] Version 1.00 works fine and does not crash, your point is moot. [quote]I

[quote]while a Kol has the ability to colinize[/quote] what?

google starbase vasari pic starbase advent pic starbase tec pic

[quote] This has nothing to do with EULAs. Go ask people how many of them think "oh gee, but the EULA doesn't allow this" when they're thinking of purchasing a used game. Fact: people assume that a used game works just as well as a new one. Because they almost always do, and when they don't there tends to be a good reason for it (greediness not being one of them).[/quote] don't assume it makes you look stupied

[quote]simple, he spend his money purchasing the product (SoaSE) from the supplier or seller (tough not directly.. he DID make a purchase) albeit 1/2 of what you paid, this doesnt mean he should get 1/2 of the customer support that would sound more like jealousy towards him [/quote] then he should complain about no suport from the supplier HE BOUGHT IT FROM. SD/IC are in no way affiliated with the transaction he has made, why do they owe h

google is your friend [e digicons]:grin:[/e]

[quote]No it doesn't. Swearing neither increases nor decreases credibility. There is no rational argument to be made against swearing.[/quote] this is agree with,b im kindasick of ppl that think swear words are *bad*. but try and make an argument based on logic instead of how you feeel the world should work, all your post's read like QQ i can't get the full game with full support for ½price. that makes you look, well not very smart(

42 - the answear to life the universe and all that stuff GG - good game (said at the end of a game to a worthy opponent) k - ok (god we're lazy sometimes) troll - a person that argues for the sake of arguing or to have fun/mess with ppl ecm - electronic counter messure eccm- electronic counter counter mesure

[quote]As we are on the same team, then, essentially, we are the same unit. If my ally makes a pact with another side, then that side also must make a pact with me. I mean come on, we are on the same team! Not sure how this problem would still exist after so many patches...[/quote] no, you played with teams unlocked. that means he can quit his allience with you anytime he wants to. that means you are not the same unit that means an AI outplaye

[quote]I 110% agree with you! That's right - no publisher or manufacturer can be held responsible for people leaving out items from games they sell second hand. In your case, the person left out one important item - the licensing - from the box you bought second hand. Then, as you yourself said, how can SD/IC be responsible?[/quote] game set match /end thread

[quote]That's what your "Sent" folder is for.[/quote] soooo, i can see the mails you send?? hmmm i don't think so [quote]That's what your "Sent" folder in Private Messages is for.[/quote] soooo, i can see the pm's you send, hmmm i dn't think so [quote]Neither of the above are required for a list of reported issues.[/quote] try again [e digicons]:grin:[/e]

how can i google a buggreport emailed to thedevteam?? how can i serch the forums for a PM sent to one of te dev's how can i update a list myself if i can't do the above?

but 1 can repair itself while you need 2 dinov's or ppl ujst focus it down to nullify the shield restore. it's miniscule diffrences, i just feel that they are a bit less dependant

[quote]Also, to the person who said vasari doesn't need caps as much as the other races, you are completely wrong. Have you every tried to take out a vasari fleet with a few cap carriers? [/quote] i think that was my post your refering to. to clarify, i don't think cap's are crap for vasri in anyway. They just seem to rely on caps a little less than tec/advent Atleast i allways seem to have a bit fewer caps in endgame as vasarithen as tec

1/ This may allready be up, if so im just a nitvik that needs to l2forum. If that is the case just ignore this. 2/ this is not directed at the beta testing, but during *normal play* --------------------------------------------------------------------- it would be nice to have a sticky where we can see known bugs that the dev team is aware of. I'm not really sure what issues the dev team is aware of and therefore wha

[quote]Finally, who doesn't want Akkan as their first cap for the mighty TEC? LOL Akkan is too cool for school, colonize, ion bolt disable, long range aura, and peace keeper, fighter supports, the ship is a miracle.[/quote] we're not saying it's bad, but vasari's and advent's colonizer is arguably the best cap the have, while tec's 2 best is the kol and marza. flak burst / missile barrge are (imo) without a doubt the 2 strongest abillities in th

just scroll down, at the bottom of the page there are a section with links to the subforums, you'll find that mines are a matter most ppl are concerned about