actually I dont, because Im not arguing the future means the N means this "______________" Im arguing there is plenty of evidence in the game. in the lore. and In Humankinds past that point at the N being Navy.
I thought it was hilarious that Telford and Young switched back while Young was getting it on. The look on Telfords face and Youngs face when that happened. At the same time, Ive got to question why Youngs wife would willingly have sex with Young when she only sees Telfords face. Technically shes banging Telford. I really didnt pay too much attention in this episode, it was your typical waste time episode. But I guess now that Rush Tricked Telford and the two idiot scientists, getting
again, nothing to back it up. Just your opinion, your only arguement is its the future, which doesnt mean squat since you cant prove that thats the mentality of future humans. Trader Defense Navy rolls off your tongue as easy as Network. The TEC isnt a Television Network, its a damn military. IE Navy.
Callen I 100% agree with your view. People are looking for something to nitpick about, before this it was the imbalance of the game, now that they cant cry about that, their looking for something new to jump on. Its funny how they act like if the Skirmisher doesnt get "balanced" with the other LF somehow Vasari Players wont be able to compete. Yet All across the boards you see people who play as Vasari with alot of wins in MP. I should start my own thread about the TECs Capitals having lackin
Dont forget Kodiaks ability to shoot across the gap between Fleets to intercept the enemy before your fleets smash against each other.
lol Im not saying that the ships for Vasari are balanced for guerilla warfare, Im saying the Vasari are using what they got to accomplish a strategy they had to adopt.
to me it means rebalancing alot of stuff, as this "planetary weapon" can kill, meaning something has to be added to counter it. If were going to submit a suggestion for an addon, atleast suggest its counter.
some people just want to have a reason not to like something different added to a game, starbases gave players a better way to fortify. Before there really wasnt much in the way players could create a defense that gave a opponent a real challenge. Even so, players still find it easy to overcome Starbases, and its sad to see people leaving over nothing more then another way to overcome or repulse your enemies that is mostly a logical step in improving the game.
Im using the description as my arguement, i could careless about if people use the ship itself. the point is the Vasari Fleet isnt made for guerilla warfare its made for mass assaults, BUT the devs made sure the actual units reflected the reasoning in the lore. IE using typical FLEET UNITS to perform Guerilla Style Warfare. (pay attention next time) The Vasari isnt the uber weak race, this is the same people who cried foul with the Advent, now moving to the Vasari. I enjoy TEC but you do
heres a quote from a ship description for the Vasari Antorak Marauder Despite a technological advantage, the Vasari Exodus Fleet strongly favors guerilla warfare tac
definitely, the bigger your fleet the bigger the AIs will be also.
Has no one noticed the Vasari's choice of tactics and strategy? They arent the big bad wolf they were 10,000 years ago. They dont have the massive empire their ancestors once controlled. They have a limited number of ships, and personell. They have to rely on guerilla warfare to accomplish their goals. When it comes to warfare, guerillas arent the best at all out shoot'em up type battles like the Advent and TEC are so capable of. They have to use their ability to slide past barrie
guess so, just have to put this thread aside til we find something to scratch off our list and redebate or something entirely new.
Well I guess well have to findout when the Devs decide to drop it all on us.
Its just sad that the writers ran out of fresh ideas for the SG franchise and instead of just letting it rest, they had to renew it with a show that spits on the very founding aspects of a very good scifi show. Its even worse they pulled original characters like Gen. O'Neill and Colonel Carter into it. Richard Dean Anderson might not of had much screen time but the fact they portrayed his character to be so cold hearted about something that would have any serviceman scratching their hea
it happens, this thread had a great run most dont last more then 3 pages, then die. But if anyone else has some input or questions that we could debate over. I think this thread finally ran out of fuel.
Chuck took a dump once, it became the prototype for the Radiance.
Im not saying its the top of the list, im saying its one of the top shows scifi fans relate to.
Yet I dont have to use the number of seasons. the majority of people in this forum alone will tell you SG is in the top list of Scifi Shows.
Problem with making a GalaxyForge map is its not an actual Custom Battle Ground. You have to build your fleet like any other game bringing the issues of rushing.
Rais Ima take that as you trying to be funny. SG1 was a great show, of course they had to change somethings that didnt match the movie, but the writers payed attention to their fan base and when they did something that tampered with the SG universe people didnt stand for it. Right now the Writers of SGU are pissing on the very values and concepts that made SG1 such a success. How many shows do you know that last longer then 5 seasons? SG1 was capable of going for 11 seasons, but they decided
theres two reasons for the pirates, lvl up Caps and harrass the enemy or atleast try to harrass. Sometimes the pirates harrass who they want to harrass. As for money, you should be getting plenty of money through other ways in the game, be it tax, trade, selling resources, embargo and theres a few other ways aswell. Pirate attacks are either a benefit to you, or an annoyance. Thats their purpose. It is random, but its random enough that it might attack you ten times, and then
Im not trying to put you down, admittedly the game has alot of quirks, but the forums have alot to offer as far as answers to alot of your questions people like Darvin, Amish, and others have accumilated dozens of guides and fact threads that are chocked full of information. That actually explain alot of the things your asking about. Even answer questions youll have before you ask them. not all of them are on the front page sometimes you have to scan two or three pages to get to them. but the
why is it that everything seems troublesome to this guy. this is what the third post hes made to complain about something in game? All of which has been mentioned before in other threads he could have just commented in instead of creating a new one.
If you need siege frigates it means your beyond collecting up the nuetral planets. It means your now actively fighting for your enemies territory. I dont see why people rely on only 1 Cap. It doesnt bring out the best of the Cap when its the only one. Kols are nice but without Dunovs they dont have a chance, Akkans are pretty nice to have when collecting planets but when it comes to actually dealing out heavy damage it doesnt hold up without a Dunov. The fact is all the Capitals are built to
