MayallCommunion

MayallCommunion

Joined Member # 4493820
66 Posts 829 Replies 20,808 Reputation

Its just its not really a BS attitude that is generally how it is. I mean no offense to SP players but its just how it is sometimes and how things have to be accepted.

72 Replies 279,537 Views

[quote who="Blueshocked" reply="35" id="3148572"] Quoting MayallCommunion, reply 34 Quoting GoaFan77, reply 28 Quoting MayallCommunion, reply 27 No it would not be ok. This has been discussed 100 time titans should not lose any levels upon death. A lot of people in this thread have already said they'd like to see one or two levels lost, so while it has been discussed 100s of times we clearly haven't reach a consensus. Alot of peop

72 Replies 279,537 Views

[quote who="GoaFan77" reply="28" id="3148439"] Quoting MayallCommunion, reply 27 No it would not be ok. This has been discussed 100 time titans should not lose any levels upon death. A lot of people in this thread have already said they'd like to see one or two levels lost, so while it has been discussed 100s of times we clearly haven't reach a consensus. [/quote] Alot of people in this thread are also single player, players;P

72 Replies 279,537 Views

Well Dominas do heal for a total of 1000 hp as well as make capital ships unable to be disable. Also a large amount of Dominas can sht down alot of important ships to the enemy fleet. This combined with Repulsion is really stupid.

10 Replies 6,907 Views

I dont see anything wrong with giving the Domina a way to counter repulsion. It really wont put it over the line considering it cannot hit Capital Ships. Riddleking while not exactly orthodox try to test out mass Dominas + eradica for lulz.

10 Replies 6,907 Views

That would be a pleasure but unfortunately a 1v1 game will prove nothing. If you are calling a race that has two upgrade Militia Weaponry/Armor that can give them a +30% damage boost their territory/4(?) armor in their territory weak. You are very, mistaken. Also concerning the two starbase upgraded, you just said that red button was buffed because TEC-L was to weak compared to the rebels and now you say that two starbases is a ridiculous upgrade. Also I do not have a computer

19 Replies 11,727 Views

@Riddleking: I actually did not say you will end up building Javelis I said you will to try to counter LF's but the actual amount will always be a small number. Or you could go the superior path which is directly to heavies. Also if you solve all your problems with Bombers does that not make bombers imbalanced because they beat everything. of course it does and everyone knows bombers need a nerf. My main point is right now the only 'effective' counter to repulsion is as you said b

154 Replies 485,762 Views

[quote who="Rebell44" reply="25" id="3148426"]I would be OK with Titan losing 2 levels after its destruction.[/quote] No it would not be ok. This has been discussed 100 time titans should not lose any levels upon death. Weird, I swear this was an edit. Ignore the doublepost

72 Replies 279,537 Views

Well Gauss being single target wont actually be able to be universally useful. I say just give it some form of better utility than its slow, for example perhaps with the slow it could also steal antimatter from its target. Or it could maybe be a single target version of Mass Disorientation it would be able to disable channeled abilities.

166 Replies 421,172 Views

[quote who="cirving4444" reply="21" id="3148222"] Quoting MayallCommunion, reply 8 But I still think Ion bolt is more fitting on the Kol than the Akkan. Edit: Also those numbers for AF need a nerf as well because if you make it a passive it has a 100% uptime and does not need to have the same statistics. I don't agree, ever since rebellion I've viewed the KOL as a baby Ragnarov. I think to

166 Replies 421,172 Views